- Lizzo called a ‘snitch’ for accusing Postmates runner of stealing food 4 Years Ago
- Government sues Edward Snowden for breaking a non-disclosure agreement 4 Years Ago
- How to stream Tottenham Hotspur vs. Olympiacos in the Champions League 4 Years Ago
- ‘Love Island’ star’s Instagram photo doctored for MAGA hat ad Today 1:16 PM
- Los Tigres del Norte carry on Johnny Cash’s legacy in stellar Folsom Prison concert film Today 1:05 PM
- Keke Palmer’s ‘sorry to this man’ meme is perfect Today 12:59 PM
- Hoodies with fake bullet holes from prominent school shootings spark outrage Today 12:44 PM
- Instagram apologizes for censoring pictures of fish Today 12:40 PM
- George R.R. Martin clarifies some things about the ‘Game of Thrones’ Targaryen prequel Today 12:20 PM
- Bill Mitchell, the Trump-loving QAnon scammer, is pushing ammunition for a civil war Today 11:53 AM
- How to stream Tigres vs. Cruz Azul in the Leagues Cup final Today 11:48 AM
- How to stream Bayern Munich vs. Belgrade Red Star in Champions League action Today 11:36 AM
- HBO Max gains the streaming rights to ‘The Big Bang Theory’ Today 11:30 AM
- Everyone hates this Russian rapper’s pro-Putin music video Today 10:34 AM
- Skull fire logs are here to make you look like a gleeful murderer Today 10:30 AM
Spying by the British government on two international human-rights groups was illegal, according to a U.K. court responsible for complaints against the government’s primary intelligence agency.
The Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights and the South African Legal Resources Centre were surveilled by the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). The intelligence agency monitored and saved emails for too long, reports the Guardian, violating the law and internal procedures, according to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT).
The spies have been ordered to destroy the communications within 14 days. No punishments or fines were levied against GCHQ as a result of the violations, which were caused by “technical errors,” according to an official GCHQ statement.
The initial surveillance was justified, according to the court ruling.
“The tribunal is concerned that steps should be taken to ensure that neither of the breaches of procedure referred to in this determination occurs again,” the court ruling said. “For the avoidance of doubt, the tribunal makes it clear that it will be making a closed report to the prime minister.”
On the same day, the court ruled that the GCHQ did not illegally spy on U.K. human-rights group Privacy International.
The GCHQ greeted the rulings as a victory, saying they “welcome the IPT’s confirmation that any interception by GCHQ was undertaken lawfully and proportionately, and that where breaches of policies occurred they were not sufficiently serious to warrant any compensation to be paid to the bodies involved.”
While the human-rights organizations won small victories, they criticized the overall rulings.
“Trying to pass off such failings as ‘technical’, or significant changes in law as mere ‘clarifications’, has become a tiring defense for those who know the jig is up,” Privacy International director Eric King told the Register. “The courts are helping to ensure that the sun is slowly setting on GCHQ’s Wild West ways. Now we need Parliament to step in to fix what should have been fixed a long time ago.”
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.