- Elizabeth Warren calls on Congress to impeach Trump 2 Years Ago
- BlackBerry Messenger is still a thing—but not for much longer 2 Years Ago
- Matt Gaetz hires speechwriter fired by White House for attending white nationalist event Today 1:33 PM
- Here’s why Elon Musk is a sheep on Twitter Today 12:14 PM
- Trump is already running Facebook ads on the Mueller report Today 12:07 PM
- 20 thoughtful gifts grads actually want Today 12:00 PM
- 7 of the best psychological thriller movies on Shudder Today 11:44 AM
- Seth Abramson’s epic Mueller thread finally comes to a conclusion Today 11:40 AM
- Netflix is testing out a random play feature Today 11:28 AM
- Teen star Danielle Cohn faked pregnancy for YouTube prank Today 10:55 AM
- How to watch ‘A Discovery of Witches’ for free Today 10:42 AM
- Rev up your own family rivalries with these ‘Game of Thrones’ board games Today 10:29 AM
- Mueller’s ‘harm to ongoing matter’ is the best way to stay silent about your life Today 10:21 AM
- 10 Korean skincare brands that are worth your money Today 10:00 AM
- 20 unique Mother’s Day gifts for the cool moms Today 9:45 AM
The ruling was unanimous.
In a blunt repudiation of the Trump administration, a federal appeals court decided unanimously to uphold a temporary restraining order on President Donald Trump‘s ban on travelers and refugees from several Muslim-majority countries.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 29-page opinion issued on Thursday that it would not lift a hold on Trump’s travel ban. All three jurists on the panel agreed the stay on the travel ban should remain in place.
The decision to uphold the temporary stay on the travel ban is not a ruling on its constitutionality.
U.S. District Judge James Robart on Friday issued a nationwide stay on the travel ban after lawsuits filed by Washington state and Minnesota.
The travel ban, which sparked worldwide chaos and nationwide protests after its implementation nearly two weeks ago, forbid entry for anyone from seven predominantly Muslim nations—Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen—on national security grounds. Some 60,000 people had their visas revoked due to the ban.
The Department of Justice argued before the 9th Circuit that Trump’s executive order was within the legal bounds of the president’s authority. Attorneys for Washington state and Minnesota said it unconstitutionally barred people entry based on their religion, supported by Trump’s own comments about Muslims.
In their decision, 9th Circuit judges concurred, noting that Trump’s threats of a “Muslim ban” were grounds for discrimination.
Awaiting the 9th Circuit’s decision, Trump condemned Robart as a “so-called” judge and argued the “court system” would put Americans in “peril” if the stay on his ban was upheld.
Soon after the decision, Trump warned, in all capital letters, “SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!”
SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2017
The case will likely now head to the Supreme Court of the United States, where it risks a split 4-to-4 decision due to the vacant ninth seat.
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.