- Prosecutor almost directly quoted Bible in trial against man who helped migrants 2 Years Ago
- TikTok’s time warp videos get it twisted 2 Years Ago
- Is a ‘Stranger Things’ and Fortnite crossover event going to happen? 2 Years Ago
- YouTube reportedly thinking about moving all kids content off the main site 2 Years Ago
- AOC calls out Democrats for tone-deaf Beyoncé tweet Today 3:15 PM
- Democrat candidates come out as ‘wife guys’ Today 2:45 PM
- Poll of best Batman actors fails to include Adam West, and fans are not happy Today 2:25 PM
- ‘Pose’ producer Janet Mock lands historic Netflix deal Today 1:54 PM
- Teen confesses to killing her best friend on video to get $9 million from a stranger online Today 1:28 PM
- Democrats vote to block transgender troop ban Today 12:17 PM
- Twitch-famous bounty hunter kicks down target’s door in wildly popular live stream Today 11:42 AM
- New GOP bill would audit major tech companies for bias Today 11:37 AM
- Instagram artist accused of faking her paintings says they’re ‘100%’ real Today 11:33 AM
- Trump refuses to apologize for Central Park Five death penalty ads Today 11:08 AM
- While Rubio smiles at Trump’s campaign rally, the internet drags him Today 11:04 AM
The ruling was unanimous.
In a blunt repudiation of the Trump administration, a federal appeals court decided unanimously to uphold a temporary restraining order on President Donald Trump‘s ban on travelers and refugees from several Muslim-majority countries.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 29-page opinion issued on Thursday that it would not lift a hold on Trump’s travel ban. All three jurists on the panel agreed the stay on the travel ban should remain in place.
The decision to uphold the temporary stay on the travel ban is not a ruling on its constitutionality.
U.S. District Judge James Robart on Friday issued a nationwide stay on the travel ban after lawsuits filed by Washington state and Minnesota.
The travel ban, which sparked worldwide chaos and nationwide protests after its implementation nearly two weeks ago, forbid entry for anyone from seven predominantly Muslim nations—Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen—on national security grounds. Some 60,000 people had their visas revoked due to the ban.
The Department of Justice argued before the 9th Circuit that Trump’s executive order was within the legal bounds of the president’s authority. Attorneys for Washington state and Minnesota said it unconstitutionally barred people entry based on their religion, supported by Trump’s own comments about Muslims.
In their decision, 9th Circuit judges concurred, noting that Trump’s threats of a “Muslim ban” were grounds for discrimination.
Awaiting the 9th Circuit’s decision, Trump condemned Robart as a “so-called” judge and argued the “court system” would put Americans in “peril” if the stay on his ban was upheld.
Soon after the decision, Trump warned, in all capital letters, “SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!”
SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2017
The case will likely now head to the Supreme Court of the United States, where it risks a split 4-to-4 decision due to the vacant ninth seat.
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.