- Ninja mocked for not knowing how to make a sandwich Wednesday 9:30 PM
- Marvel comics writer discusses misogyny in the industry Wednesday 9:09 PM
- TikTok conspiracy theorists think Juice WRLD is still alive Wednesday 7:03 PM
- Conservatives are protesting YouTube’s new harassment rules Wednesday 5:36 PM
- YouTuber’s ‘creepy’ comment about Taylor Swift’s eggs gets ratioed Wednesday 5:31 PM
- Bloomberg razzed for accidentally making an Alexa Fleshlight Wednesday 5:29 PM
- Who is putting cowboy hats on pigeons? Wednesday 4:33 PM
- Scammer reportedly bribed Facebook employee to keep posts up Wednesday 3:36 PM
- The 1975’s singer criticized for ‘Islamophobic’ rant Wednesday 3:22 PM
- Ready to dish out $52K for Apple’s new Mac Pro? Wednesday 3:03 PM
- N.K. Jemisin and Jamal Campbell discuss their new Green Lantern comic, ‘Far Sector’ Wednesday 3:00 PM
- YouTube says it will be harsher on creators with ‘patterns of harassing behavior’ Wednesday 1:15 PM
- Why one senator stopped a vote on net neutrality Wednesday 12:49 PM
- Man reportedly denied refugee status after officials fail to forward email Wednesday 12:09 PM
- ‘Jojo Rabbit’ star to lead Disney+ ‘Home Alone’ reboot Wednesday 12:08 PM
In a blunt repudiation of the Trump administration, a federal appeals court decided unanimously to uphold a temporary restraining order on President Donald Trump‘s ban on travelers and refugees from several Muslim-majority countries.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 29-page opinion issued on Thursday that it would not lift a hold on Trump’s travel ban. All three jurists on the panel agreed the stay on the travel ban should remain in place.
The decision to uphold the temporary stay on the travel ban is not a ruling on its constitutionality.
U.S. District Judge James Robart on Friday issued a nationwide stay on the travel ban after lawsuits filed by Washington state and Minnesota.
The travel ban, which sparked worldwide chaos and nationwide protests after its implementation nearly two weeks ago, forbid entry for anyone from seven predominantly Muslim nations—Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen—on national security grounds. Some 60,000 people had their visas revoked due to the ban.
The Department of Justice argued before the 9th Circuit that Trump’s executive order was within the legal bounds of the president’s authority. Attorneys for Washington state and Minnesota said it unconstitutionally barred people entry based on their religion, supported by Trump’s own comments about Muslims.
In their decision, 9th Circuit judges concurred, noting that Trump’s threats of a “Muslim ban” were grounds for discrimination.
Awaiting the 9th Circuit’s decision, Trump condemned Robart as a “so-called” judge and argued the “court system” would put Americans in “peril” if the stay on his ban was upheld.
Soon after the decision, Trump warned, in all capital letters, “SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!”
SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2017
The case will likely now head to the Supreme Court of the United States, where it risks a split 4-to-4 decision due to the vacant ninth seat.
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.