- Fan-created ‘app’ lets users experience the final moments of the ill-fated Jeremy Renner app Monday 10:00 PM
- Milo Yiannopoulos receives lifetime ban from furry convention Monday 7:49 PM
- Snapchat just made all political ads purchased publicly available Monday 6:12 PM
- How to stream Barcelona vs. Borussia Dortmund in Champions League action Monday 5:39 PM
- How to stream Liverpool vs. Napoli in Champions League action Monday 5:19 PM
- How to make real money with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Monday 5:03 PM
- How to stream Chelsea vs. Valencia in the Champions League group stage Monday 4:47 PM
- ‘SNL’ fires Shane Gillis for racist, homophobic comments Monday 4:41 PM
- Ben Shapiro wants accusers to describe Brett Kavanaugh’s penis Monday 4:30 PM
- Twitch suspends streamer for wearing Chun-Li cosplay Monday 4:11 PM
- Report: 8 years of Trump tax returns subpoenaed by prosecutors Monday 3:45 PM
- Netflix lands exclusive streaming rights to ‘Seinfeld’ Monday 3:34 PM
- Jenny Slate sets first comedy special at Netflix Monday 3:05 PM
- #EndSmearFear is aiming to save lives Monday 2:54 PM
- Netflix ‘Living With Yourself’ trailer offers a double dose of Paul Rudd Monday 2:07 PM
Consumer advocates on Tuesday urged the House not to pass a bill that they said would hamper the government’s ability to protect Internet users from unfair practices, shortly after the White House promised that President Obama would veto the bill if it reached his desk.
The House is scheduled to vote this week on the No Rate Regulation of Broadband Internet Access Act, which would ban the Federal Communications Commission from regulating Internet prices under its 2015 net-neutrality rules.
The consumer groups said in their letter to House leaders that the bill was overly broad and would effectively prevent the FCC from taking other kinds of enforcement actions, like reviewing telecom company mergers, demanding changes to data caps, and scrutinizing zero-rating, the practice of excluding certain services from counting against one’s data limit.
“Under the bill,” the groups said in their letter, “broadband providers could characterize any and every rule or determination the FCC makes as a ‘rate regulation’ if it prevents these ISPs from charging abusive penalties or tolls.”
“Although the FCC is not setting rates,” the groups said, “stripping away its authority to review monopoly charges and other unjust and unreasonable business practices would harm everyone.”
The White House echoed these concerns in a Statement of Administration Policy released late Tuesday. It said the bill “would restrict the FCC’s ability to take enforcement actions to protect consumers on issues where the FCC has received numerous consumer complaints,” and it promised that Obama would veto the legislation if Congress passed it.
The rate-regulation bill is part of a broader push by Republican lawmakers to roll back pieces of the FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order, which applied net-neutrality protections to broadband Internet and gave the agency the power to stop ISPs from throttling speeds, blocking access to sites or online services, and charging higher rates for faster access to Internet content.
The House Rules Committee approved a vote schedule for the bill on Tuesday, including several Democratic amendments aimed at softening its impact.
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.