- Jeff Bezos’ girlfriend allegedly sent his nudes to her brother, who then leaked them Saturday 6:38 PM
- This Instagram account catches influencers in the wild Saturday 5:42 PM
- The best upcoming video games to look out for in February 2020 Saturday 5:23 PM
- TikTok teens use AirPods and Google Translate to secretly talk in class Saturday 4:32 PM
- Video shows corpses of coronavirus victims lying in China hospital Saturday 3:44 PM
- Kid meets Slipknot after drumming video goes viral Saturday 2:30 PM
- Channing Tatum responds to troll who tried to compare Jenna Dewan and Jessie J’s looks Saturday 1:46 PM
- Grindr pulls an ‘I don’t know her’ after Eminem suggests he uses the app Saturday 12:48 PM
- Here are the top 10 most popular Instagram models in 2020 Saturday 12:21 PM
- ‘The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina’ takes its characters on a fantasy adventure to Hell in season 3 Saturday 11:37 AM
- Woman no longer in sorority, school after racist MLK post Saturday 10:45 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Miss Americana’ starts to deconstruct the myth of Taylor Swift Saturday 10:32 AM
- Teens charged with attempted arson after participating in TikTok ‘outlet challenge’ Saturday 8:56 AM
- ‘American Dirt’ is a metaphor for a white country built on the back of immigrants Saturday 6:00 AM
- This woman told two students to ‘speak English’ and people are not having it Friday 9:53 PM
Facebook announced on Tuesday that all posts from politicians on the platform will be considered newsworthy and subject to less restrictions.
The social media giant made the announcement in a blog post on Tuesday. Within it, it says: “from now on we will treat speech from politicians as newsworthy content that should, as a general rule, be seen and heard.”
The company has had a newsworthiness exemption since 2016.
Facebook also announced that while it does not send content or ads from politicians to third parties for fact-checking, if a politician does share previously debunked content, the company will “demote that content, display related information from fact-checkers, and reject its inclusion in advertisements.”
“That’s why I want to be really clear today—we do not submit speech by politicians to our independent fact-checkers, and we generally allow it on the platform even when it would otherwise breach our normal content rules,” Nick Clegg, the company’s vice president of global affairs and communications, said in prepared remarks from a speech that was attached to the blog post. “Of course, there are exceptions. Broadly speaking they are two-fold: where speech endangers people; and where we take money, which is why we have more stringent rules on advertising than we do for ordinary speech and rhetoric.”
Facebook is not the only company that has grappled with politicians’ posts that may violate its standards.
In June, Twitter announced that it would put a warning label on tweets from politicians were against its rules. The label, which would apply only to politicians, would say the company’s rules were violated by the tweet, but that Twitter “determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the tweet to remain available.”
You can read all of Facebook’s announcement here.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).