- Ta-Nehisi Coates dismantles Mitch McConnell’s anti-reparations argument Wednesday 7:52 PM
- Whoopi Goldberg stirs debate over her opinion regarding Bella Thorne’s nudes Wednesday 7:04 PM
- Joe Biden really, really hates raves Wednesday 6:02 PM
- RIP to the Twitter geotagging feature that no one actually used Wednesday 5:14 PM
- Facebook contractors reveal the horrors of moderating graphic content Wednesday 4:42 PM
- Prosecutor almost directly quoted Bible in trial against man who helped migrants Wednesday 4:05 PM
- TikTok’s time warp videos get it twisted Wednesday 4:03 PM
- Is a ‘Stranger Things’ and Fortnite crossover event going to happen? Wednesday 3:55 PM
- YouTube reportedly thinking about moving all kids content off the main site Wednesday 3:50 PM
- AOC calls out Democrats for tone-deaf Beyoncé tweet Wednesday 3:15 PM
- Democrat candidates come out as ‘wife guys’ Wednesday 2:45 PM
- Poll of best Batman actors fails to include Adam West, and fans are not happy Wednesday 2:25 PM
- ‘Pose’ producer Janet Mock lands historic Netflix deal Wednesday 1:54 PM
- Teen confesses to killing her best friend on video to get $9 million from a stranger online Wednesday 1:28 PM
- Democrats vote to block transgender troop ban Wednesday 12:17 PM
Far-right blogs claim emails between Facebook and Clinton’s campaign show collusion
Evidence shows otherwise.
Right-wing media outlets and supporters of President Donald Trump are claiming a series of emails released by Wikileaks founder Julian Assange between members of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and Facebook officials prove that the social media giant was pushing for her to win the 2016 election.
On Thursday night, Assange tweeted out several highlighted emails between Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg, Mark Zuckerberg, and Clinton officials like John Podesta. The emails are mostly innocuous, yet websites such as Russian-government-funded RT, Breitbart, and True Pundit are claiming they show collusion between the social media giant and Clinton’s 2016 election campaign.
In one email, Podesta wishes Sandberg a happy new year, and later adds, “look forward to working with you to elect the first woman President of the United States.” In another email, Sandberg says she wants Clinton to win “badly.” Zuckerburg wrote to Podesta that he “enjoyed spending time” with him and asks if it would be OK to reach out to him in the future.
Podesta emails reveal that Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg wanted Hillary Clinton to win "badly", provided research to her in March 2015 and met privately with her on multiple occasions. https://t.co/SxNQ4etdPD pic.twitter.com/dqyRG2zuln
— Julian Assange ⌛ (@JulianAssange) September 28, 2017
Sandberg was a Clinton supporter and endorsed her during the election. It’s not entirely shocking that she would express her desire for Clinton to win the presidency in an email to Podesta.
While right-wing outlets and web communities seem to think these emails show a conspiracy between Facebook and Clinton’s campaign, recent reports actually show that Facebook was used as part of the widespread effort by Russian agents to influence the 2016 election in favor of Trump.
If there was some sort of coordinated effort between the tech giant and Clinton’s campaign, it’s unlikely it would have missed $100,000 worth of ads being sold to a Russian “troll farm” and the 470 inauthentic accounts it believes were likely “operated out of Russia.” Not to mention Russian agents posing as a well-known Muslim American group on a Facebook page spreading memes and misinformation during the election.
People on Twitter were quick to point out their feelings about Assange’s out-of-nowhere email drop.
BREAKING: Known Democrat preferred Democratic candidate. Scandalous!
— Luke Russell (@LukeRussell1281) September 29, 2017
What. A. Scoop. pic.twitter.com/c3x0hA5fQy
— d f (@DeniseFlores) September 29, 2017
Good lord, imbecile. She was a major Hillary supporter/endorser. Of course she wanted her to win. Great work busting this one open. https://t.co/Q7FkX4W7oE
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) September 29, 2017
Well Duh. She was a major supporter. Not very bright are you?
— Jamie (@jessied44) September 29, 2017
Good work Nancy Drew!
— Dan Brillman (@DanBrillman) September 29, 2017
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).