- Lawsuit alleges YouTube’s unboxing videos are ‘abusive’ ads aimed at kids Sunday 3:48 PM
- Dr. Dre shades Lori Loughlin with Instagram flex about his daughter getting into USC Sunday 3:13 PM
- University of Georgia frat’s racist Snapchat video draws campus outrage Sunday 1:21 PM
- Facing criticism for eating fish, vegan YouTube star Rawvana speaks out Sunday 10:47 AM
- Arnold Schwarzenegger chases mini-pony in new TikTok video Sunday 9:19 AM
- Review: ‘Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice’ is a cut above the rest Sunday 8:00 AM
- Where do 2020 Democratic candidates stand on healthcare? Sunday 7:30 AM
- How to (legally) stream live TV on Kodi Sunday 7:00 AM
- ‘Delhi Crime’ tackles inequality and women’s rights Sunday 7:00 AM
- How to watch the 2019 STP 500 at Martinsville Speedway for free Sunday 6:00 AM
- These high school theater kids put on a totally awesome ‘Alien’ play Saturday 3:59 PM
- Behold these photos of Elon Musk, but with Elizabeth Holmes’ eyes Saturday 3:11 PM
- Barbra Streisand gets ‘canceled’ over remarks about Michael Jackson’s alleged victims Saturday 2:09 PM
- Report: Florida man raped Texas teen after posing as Instagram celeb Saturday 12:14 PM
- Lori Loughlin’s daughters, Olivia and Isabella, could be banned from USC forever Saturday 11:46 AM
Facebook ads use communist, Nazi imagery to attack Democrat House candidate
The person behind the campaign remains anonymous.
Virginia Democratic candidate Jennifer Wexton is the target of an extreme and anonymous Facebook advertisement campaign as she fights to unseat Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-Va.) in the state’s contested 10th Congressional District race.
The ads, which appeared on Monday, have been traced back to a social media page called “Wacky Wexton Not.” They brand the Democrat as an “evil socialist” and depict her next to a tall shadow throwing a Nazi salute.
“What’s the difference???” the caption asks. “Nothing!! Both are liars.”
Wexton’s spokesperson Aaron Fritschner released a statement announcing that the campaign would investigate the matter.
“The Wexton campaign is reviewing the bizarre, false ads and the page sponsoring them which appears to be designed to spread disinformation, to determine whether they comply with applicable rules,” Fritschner said, according to the New York Times.
Whichever individual or group is behind the ad campaign has not listed any personal information. A description on the Facebook page includes this text: “Paid for by a freedom loving American Citizen exercising my natural law right, protected by the 1st Amendment and protected by the 2nd Amendment.”
Facebook’s advertising policy allows the owner of even political ads to remain anonymous to the public but verify their identity to the company privately.
Speaking to the New York Times, Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone said that the company would not disclose the user or users’ identity to protect their privacy. He added that the controversial ads were allowed under Facebook’s policies.
Stone pointed to Facebook’s ad archive as one move the company has undertaken to deliver “meaningful transparency.”
It still remains a mystery who is behind the vicious campaign, but Comstock’s office was keen to distance itself completely.
“We are not involved with that page in any way, shape, or form,” a spokesperson asserted in a statement.
David Gilmour is a reporter who specializes in national politics, internet culture, and technology. He previously covered civil liberties, crime, and politics for Vice.