- People on Twitter ask whose ancestors would’ve passed immigrant ‘wealth test’ Monday 6:54 PM
- Kobe Bryant helicopter crash mocked in teen’s TikTok video Monday 6:38 PM
- Chiefs, Bears, Packers have Twitter accounts hacked Monday 3:48 PM
- Washington Post reporter suspended amid backlash over Kobe Bryant tweet Monday 3:08 PM
- America is united in hating Ken Starr’s impeachment hat Monday 3:01 PM
- In ‘Cuties,’ the contradictions of growing up come to a head Monday 1:55 PM
- Racist tweets blame fruit bat soup for coronavirus Monday 1:25 PM
- What is the #ILeftTheGOP movement? Monday 1:21 PM
- The Grammys were weird and sad—but the Billy Porter hat memes offered some levity Monday 12:36 PM
- Auschwitz Museum calls on Facebook to ban Holocaust denialism Monday 11:59 AM
- YouTuber who said his girlfriend was dead now says he faked it Monday 11:42 AM
- Review: Kentucky Route Zero is one of the most magical games ever made Monday 11:00 AM
- Backlash grows against Clearview as lawsuit looms Monday 10:58 AM
- Tyler the Creator calls out the Grammys for racism over ‘Rap Album’ win Monday 10:25 AM
- Democrats call on John Bolton to testify after book bombshell Monday 9:56 AM
On Tuesday, attorneys for the man authorities believe is responsible for a mass shooting in South Carolina filed a request for a dismissal of the federal charges brought against their client, claiming the charges are unconstitutional and should be left to state authorities.
Dylann Roof is charged with the June 2015 murders of nine people at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina. During a weekly Bible study at the church, Roof, then 21, allegedly opened fire with a handgun and killed the attending parishioners.
Roof faces a total of 33 federal charges, including use of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, nine counts of murder, and hate crime acts resulting in death. Federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.
The federal indictment claims that Roof placed a manuscript and photos on a website expressing his racist beliefs, that he chose to attack the Emanuel AME Church because it had a predominately black membership, that Roof attacked African-Americans to increase racial tensions, and more.
His attorneys, however, are arguing the case should be handled by state authorities, saying the federal government is “exceeding their grounds” under the Commerce Clause and Thirteenth amendment by indicting Roof. They also say the case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
“The charges at issue are extremely grave, but under the Constitution they are not properly charged,” one of Roof’s attorneys, Sarah Gannett, said, according to Tuscon News Now. “The defendant therefore requests that the indictment be dismissed.”
According to Roof’s lawyers, the wish for dismissal is only being made because federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.
“Before setting out these constitutional claims, counsel wish to emphasize that this motion is being made only because the statutes at issue form the basis of the government’s request for the death penalty,” the motion reads.
If the government withdraws the death penalty, Roof’s lawyers say he will plead guilty to all counts in the indictment.
Unlike other federal cases where state prosecution is dismissed in favor of federal prosecution, or where the federal case is charged after the state case, the federal and state cases here were charged simultaneously, WCBD reports. In both cases, Roof faces a the death penalty or life in prison without release.
Jury selection for Roof’s federal trial is scheduled to start on Nov. 7. The state case is scheduled for trial on Jan. 17, 2017.
Read the full request below, courtesy of Tuscon News Now:
Alexandra Samuels is a political reporter at the Texas Tribune and contributor to the Daily Dot, where she started as an intern covering politics in the summer of 2016. She enjoys Marvel movies, baking, and reading murder-mystery novels.