- Is Trump defiling the U.S. flag in this MAGA dude’s artwork? Sunday 4:41 PM
- White woman claims she invented sleep bonnets, selling them for $100 Sunday 4:03 PM
- Even real cats are transfixed by the enigma that is the ‘Cats’ trailer Sunday 3:04 PM
- Wait, how tall is Peppa Pig? Sunday 1:55 PM
- Twitter suspends Iranian state media outlets for harassing members of a religious minority Sunday 1:06 PM
- Pro-MAGA pageant queen stripped of title over ‘offensive’ tweets Sunday 11:52 AM
- Marvel unveiled its Phase 4 plans at San Diego Comic-Con Sunday 9:16 AM
- How a queer Instagram is helping fight the opioid epidemic in Appalachia Sunday 6:30 AM
- Philadelphia to fire 13 officers for racist, violent Facebook posts Saturday 6:12 PM
- Nick Offerman is so down to play every single role in ‘Cats’ Saturday 4:27 PM
- Woman documents how airport staff broke her wheelchair Saturday 3:04 PM
- Funeral home allegedly posted photos of woman’s dead body on social media Saturday 1:56 PM
- Alinity Divine is being investigated after throwing her cat during stream (updated) Saturday 12:04 PM
- ‘Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee’ returns with Seinfeld making a racist joke about China Saturday 10:26 AM
- YouTubers Eugenia Cooney and Shane Dawson make a joint comeback Saturday 9:06 AM
Appeals court affirms ruling Trump can’t block people on Twitter
Gage Skidmore/Flickr (CC-BY-SA)
A lower court’s decision was appealed.
The second circuit appeals court upheld a ruling from U.S. District Court in the Southern District that found Trump’s blocking of critics was unconstitutional. That ruling was appealed by the administration, leading to Tuesday’s decision.
The lawsuit was brought by a group of Twitter users and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.
“President Donald J. Trump appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York… concluding that he engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination by utilizing Twitter’s ‘blocking’ function to limit certain users’ access to his social media account, which is otherwise open to the public at large, because he disagrees with their speech. We hold that he engaged in such discrimination and, consequently, affirm the judgment below,” Judge Barrington D. Parker wrote in the decision.
The decision is careful to point out that it was not ruling on whether an elected official can block someone from their private social media accounts or whether social media companies are bound by the First Amendment.
However, as Parker wrote:
“We do conclude, however, that the First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees.”
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit argued that Trump’s Twitter account was a public forum. The president routinely makes announcements about his administration on the platform, including hirings and firings.
- Twitter, Facebook reportedly not invited to Trump social media summit
- Apple is trolling Google with this billboard about privacy
- Report: Donald Trump using models as supporters in Facebook ads
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).