- ‘Watchmen’ delivers a surprisingly conventional superhero finale Sunday 10:11 PM
- Facebook ads are spreading misinformation about HIV Sunday 10:11 PM
- Military investigates students’ suspected white power hand signs at football game Sunday 9:41 PM
- North Carolina man allegedly stole $88K then posted it on Instagram Sunday 8:34 PM
- People are pissed a CGI influencer said she was sexually assaulted Sunday 4:56 PM
- BTS’ RM says he’s lost 33 AirPods Sunday 3:59 PM
- Taylor Swift’s ‘hyper-realistic’ cat cake is scaring fans Sunday 3:03 PM
- Nick Cannon is reportedly playing his Eminem diss track on repeat Sunday 1:20 PM
- College quarterback blasted by ex-girlfriend in savage AF breakup TikTok Sunday 12:27 PM
- Hallmark pulls ad featuring lesbian couple after conservative protest Sunday 11:27 AM
- Actress’ tweet calling out fellow passenger for not moving seats backfires Sunday 10:43 AM
- The 10 most influential hashtags of the decade Sunday 6:30 AM
- A lonely grandma sought family to spend Christmas with on Craigslist Saturday 5:45 PM
- Airbnb bans white supremacists tied to Iron March forum Saturday 5:07 PM
- Did a Twitter user really get tricked into naming baby ‘Jack Ingof’? Saturday 4:46 PM
Likely because it sounds so outrageous, the business practice of billing customers who write negative online reviews is not well known, but it is a thing that exists, and now a few U.S. lawmakers are doing what they can to stop it.
Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, introduced on Thursday the Consumer Review Freedom Act, a bill which seeks to prohibit businesses from from penalizing consumers who speak out negatively about a company’s products or services.
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) introduced a similar House bill by the same name this April.
In a statement, Thune said that online reviews are now an integral part of how Internet users make consumer decisions. “This free market system, which empowers customers, cannot thrive if reviewers face intimidation against airing truthful criticisms,” he said.
Thune’s effort is supported by the Internet Association, a Washington trade group that represents some of the biggest online companies, including Google and Yelp, the Washington Post reports. The group’s president, Michael Beckerman, told the newspaper that the legislation was essential to “protecting freedom of speech online,” which is in turn “fundamental to the success of the Internet.”
“Meritless lawsuits filed for the sole purpose of intimidating consumers and stifling public debate must be addressed by Congress,” Beckerman said.
In an article Thursday, Post reporter Brian Fung recalled the case of a Utah couple charged $3,500 after issuing a not-so-great review about the online retailer KlearGear. The company claimed the pair, Jennifer and John Palmer, had agreed to a “non-disparagement clause,” which was buried in its terms of service, and prohibited customers from doing anything to negatively impact the company’s public image.
As it turns out, KlearGear had actually failed to deliver the products the Palmers had ordered. Nevertheless, the company escalated the claim all the way to a collections agency, devastating the couple’s credit score. A federal judge eventually awarded them more than $306,000 in compensatory and punitive damages, but the entire process, from review to ruling, took roughly five years.
The bill’s sponsors—including Sen. Brian Shatz (D-Hawaii) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.)—hope to move the bill to markup by the end of the year, according to the Post.
Dell Cameron was a reporter at the Daily Dot who covered security and politics. In 2015, he revealed the existence of an American hacker on the U.S. government's terrorist watchlist. He is a co-author of the Sabu Files, an award-nominated investigation into the FBI's use of cyber-informants. He became a staff writer at Gizmodo in 2017.