- Camila María Concepcíon, trans activist and Netflix writer, dies at 28 Thursday 5:46 PM
- Chrissy Teigen calls out fan who made weird comment about her daughter’s feet Thursday 4:57 PM
- TikTok’s ‘clean queen’ says videos are helping her figure out ‘adulting’ Thursday 4:12 PM
- Clearview clients include ICE, Macy’s, Best Buy, leaked data reveals Thursday 4:08 PM
- Women are clamoring to get their photos on a Twitter feed of ‘hot mugshots’ Thursday 4:06 PM
- ‘Love Is Blind’ finale: Somehow, real love emerged from this dystopian setting Thursday 3:57 PM
- Creator of ‘Say So’ TikTok dance appears in Doja Cat music video Thursday 3:51 PM
- Is TikTok’s algorithm actually pretty racist? Thursday 3:45 PM
- Fans freaking out over ‘Say My Name’ horror remix featured in Jordan Peele’s ‘Candyman’ Thursday 3:33 PM
- CDC graphic warns most facial hair isn’t compatible with coronavirus protection measures Thursday 1:31 PM
- Tutoring website refuses to take down ad sexualizing Asian women Thursday 1:24 PM
- MSNBC pundit loses air time after saying Sanders staffers are ‘island of misfit Black girls’ Thursday 12:36 PM
- Court says YouTube isn’t subject to First Amendment scrutiny Thursday 11:06 AM
- Russian models are Instagramming life in Wuhan Thursday 11:00 AM
- Hilary Duff suggests ‘Lizzie McGuire’ revival was halted over adult storylines Thursday 10:37 AM
Pro-CISPA lobbyists spent $605 million last year
That’s nearly 140 times what the cybersecurity bill’s opponents spent.
How much do you have to spend to make sure a controversial Internet bill passes the House?
About $605 million.
According to a study by the watchdog group the Sunlight Foundation, that’s the amount that supporters of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) spent lobbying on the members of Congress from 2011 to the fall of 2012. By contrast, groups that opposed the controversial bill spent about $4.3 million, about 140th of that amount.
The Sunlight Foundation released the study Thursday morning, a few hours before CISPA resoundingly passed the House a 288-127 vote. “While it’s impossible to say how many of those dollars were devoted to trying to influence votes on the CISPA bill,” the study’s authors wrote, “it provides some measure of the lopsidedness of the resources available to each side.”
Support for the 2013 CISPA—a similar version passed the House in 2012, but never made it further—varies widely. CISPA is designed to help U.S. companies to better deal with hackers by sharing what they know with federal agencies, like the NSA and FBI, that can help fight back. But digital privacy groups like the EFF and ACLU say this is a means for corporations to gain legal immunity when passing your otherwise lawfully protected personal information to the government.
CISPA’s sponsors, Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.), repeatedly cite the bill’s support from the tech community—”Those in the business of prosperity on the Internet,” in the words of Rogers. After all, CISPA could help those in the tech sector with their own security efforts. Numerous executives at tech companies support the bill, including heads at Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft.
Moreover, nearly 200 senior IBM executives flew to D.C. specifically to push for the bill. According to a study by Maplight, the next day, CISPA’s cosponsors jumped from two to 36. Those members received, in total, $7,626,081 from groups that support CISPA and $200,362 from the bill’s opponents.
But there’s significant Internet opposition, too. “I’m in ‘the business of prosperity on the internet’ and I opposed [Rogers’s] bill,” Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian told the Daily Dot Wednesday. “As written, it’s a bad bill for me as a citizen. That’s my first priority.”
And plenty of fellow citizens feel the same way. Millions have signed one of the many online anti-CISPA petitions, and more than 100,000 Americans told the White House the same thing in the space of just a month.
Fortunately for CISPA’s opponents, if the bill were to pass the Senate—and whether it would even get picked up is unclear—the Obama administration has promised to veto the bill without major privacy concessions.
Photo via Wikimedia Commons
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.