- Instagram and Facebook are reportedly blocking queer ads Friday 8:58 PM
- Review: Tyler Perry’s ‘A Fall From Grace’ is both nonsensical and utterly predictable Friday 6:48 PM
- Is Hulu censoring the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain’s ‘Parts Unknown’? Friday 6:05 PM
- Trump admin celebrates Michelle Obama’s birthday by proposing rollback of her signature initiative Friday 4:01 PM
- TSA apologizes after agent grabs indigenous woman’s braids, says ‘giddyup’ Friday 3:28 PM
- Blue Bell ice cream licker pleads guilty Friday 2:54 PM
- 7 fortune-telling sites for when you’re bored Friday 2:21 PM
- Governor bans sex puns on free condom wrappers Friday 2:16 PM
- Is Justin Bieber’s ‘Yummy’ video secretly about Pizzagate? Friday 1:01 PM
- Woah Vicky rips out her hair in botched cultural appropriation attempt Friday 12:30 PM
- Here’s an exclusive look at ‘Weathering With You’ Friday 11:57 AM
- TikTok dudes are dipping their balls in soy sauce for ‘science’ Friday 11:49 AM
- Pete Buttigieg’s denial of fixing bread prices becomes its own meme Friday 11:10 AM
- Houston Astros get torched with buzzer memes after new revelation Friday 10:41 AM
- Teens are eating cereal out of each other’s mouths for clout Friday 10:34 AM
CISPA returns thanks to Sony hack
CISPA, the Internet’s most-hated cybersecurity bill, has risen from the grave yet again.
CISPA is back.
Capitalizing on the recent Sony hack, which got the country frantic about cyberattacks, one of the two original authors of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) said he will introduce that bill for a third time on Friday.
“The reason I’m putting bill in now is I want to keep the momentum going on what’s happening out there in the world,” Ruppersberger told the Hill.
More than other cybersecurity legislation introduced in recent years, previous versions of CISPA were resoundingly condemned as “a privacy nightmare” by privacy advocates. They advocated a temporary suspension of privacy laws when an American system is being hacked and wants to immediately share what they’re seeing with law enforcement.
Both those iterations of CISPA stood as an expression of the Republican-led House’s point of view, and never stood much chance of passing. The Democrat-held Senate had their own cybersecurity bills, like the Cybersecurity Act. They garnered a better reception from privacy advocates but also never went anywhere.
President Obama vowed to veto CISPA both times it passed the House. But this time could be different. Those two times, he expressed a hope that the Senate could work out a compromise that the House could agree on. But now, with Republicans controlling the Senate, he may be more willing to back down.
Ruppersberger is without his longtime partner in CISPA, former Michigan Rep. Mike Rogers, a Republican who headed the House Intelligence Committee. It’s not clear at the outset that Ruppersberger had gathered much support.
Representatives from Ruppersberger’s office were unable to immediately respond to the Daily Dot’s request for comment about potential privacy protections in this version of CISPA. But the congressman doesn’t have a great track record: In the last version, he touted the fact that he asked the ACLU for privacy advice. ACLU lawyers told the Daily Dot that while it’s true they spoke with Ruppersberger, he didn’t include their suggestions.
Photo via U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Flickr
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.