- Even teachers are in on TikTok’s #hitthewoah 4 Years Ago
- Editor’s history of calling trans people ‘frauds’ shines light on Economist’s transphobic tweet Today 2:24 PM
- New ‘Avengers: Endgame’ posters reveal the fates of several Marvel characters Today 2:12 PM
- Man pleads guilty to stealing over $100 million from Facebook, Google Today 12:59 PM
- The Washington Post is under fire for a transphobic cartoon about the Mueller Report Today 12:33 PM
- Congressman quotes ‘Mein Kampf’ on House floor Today 11:55 AM
- Rapper Tone Loc detained after confronting teen in Confederate flag hat Today 11:37 AM
- Sarah Sanders shares Mueller Madness bracket Today 10:19 AM
- NASA postpones all-women spacewalk over lack of suits that fit the female astronauts Today 10:17 AM
- Texas Rangers shortstop walks up to ‘Baby Shark’ Today 9:58 AM
- The best wireless gaming headsets under $100 Today 9:23 AM
- Trump demands networks blacklist these guests—including prominent Democrats Today 9:09 AM
- Bookworms! Now’s your chance to grab 3 months of Amazon Music for free Today 9:00 AM
- You can get paid $1,000 to binge-watch the first 20 Marvel movies Today 8:56 AM
- The ‘flat stomach’ meme has morphed into the ‘pregnant mom’ meme Today 8:43 AM
CISPA, the Internet’s most-hated cybersecurity bill, has risen from the grave yet again.
CISPA is back.
Capitalizing on the recent Sony hack, which got the country frantic about cyberattacks, one of the two original authors of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) said he will introduce that bill for a third time on Friday.
“The reason I’m putting bill in now is I want to keep the momentum going on what’s happening out there in the world,” Ruppersberger told the Hill.
More than other cybersecurity legislation introduced in recent years, previous versions of CISPA were resoundingly condemned as “a privacy nightmare” by privacy advocates. They advocated a temporary suspension of privacy laws when an American system is being hacked and wants to immediately share what they’re seeing with law enforcement.
Both those iterations of CISPA stood as an expression of the Republican-led House’s point of view, and never stood much chance of passing. The Democrat-held Senate had their own cybersecurity bills, like the Cybersecurity Act. They garnered a better reception from privacy advocates but also never went anywhere.
President Obama vowed to veto CISPA both times it passed the House. But this time could be different. Those two times, he expressed a hope that the Senate could work out a compromise that the House could agree on. But now, with Republicans controlling the Senate, he may be more willing to back down.
Ruppersberger is without his longtime partner in CISPA, former Michigan Rep. Mike Rogers, a Republican who headed the House Intelligence Committee. It’s not clear at the outset that Ruppersberger had gathered much support.
Representatives from Ruppersberger’s office were unable to immediately respond to the Daily Dot’s request for comment about potential privacy protections in this version of CISPA. But the congressman doesn’t have a great track record: In the last version, he touted the fact that he asked the ACLU for privacy advice. ACLU lawyers told the Daily Dot that while it’s true they spoke with Ruppersberger, he didn’t include their suggestions.
Photo via U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Flickr
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.