- The eyes have it in these ‘Alita: Battle Angel’ memes 4 Years Ago
- Facebook let advertisers target users interested in infamous Nazis 4 Years Ago
- Dem senator promises to put net neutrality on the ‘political hot seat’ in coming months Today 1:28 PM
- Someone figured out that Toothless from ‘How to Train Your Dragon’ looks just like Bulbasaur Today 12:44 PM
- Disturbing Snapchat video shows 17-year-old throwing dog on trampoline Today 12:16 PM
- How to watch the new Bon Appetit channel for free Today 12:03 PM
- Eminem disses Netflix for canceling ‘The Punisher’ Today 11:50 AM
- Florida prisons sued for depriving inmates of music they paid for Today 11:36 AM
- Chris Hemsworth will become Hulk Hogan for Netflix biopic Today 11:29 AM
- Fortnite just introduced a K-Pop skin, and here’s how to unlock it Today 11:06 AM
- The YouTuber who exposed the site’s ‘softcore pedophile ring’ is under attack Today 10:39 AM
- Trump randomly calls for companies to ‘step up’ their 5G efforts in U.S. Today 10:28 AM
- Professional media person: Poor people have money but they just waste it on ‘benders’ Today 10:22 AM
- Netflix acquires highest-grossing blockbuster of 2019 (so far) Today 9:29 AM
- Ocasio-Cortez blasts media over home reports after Coast Guard member’s hit list revealed Today 8:52 AM
FCC chairman says he has your back in Charter–Time Warner Cable deal
Charter isn’t Comcast—but that may not matter.
Another week, another mega-merger.
Charter Communications announced Monday that it planned to buy Time Warner Cable (TWC) for $55 billion, sparking fresh scrutiny from the Federal Communications Commission just as the agency was putting the Comcast-TWC deal behind it.
Charter would be spending $10 billion more than Comcast offered for TWC in February 2014. The Stamford, Conn.-based cable giant also said Monday that it planned to buy Bright House Networks, a smaller cable company, for $10.4 billion.
“The FCC reviews every merger on its merits and determines whether it would be in the public interest,” Wheeler said in a statement. “In applying the public interest test, an absence of harm is not sufficient. The Commission will look to see how American consumers would benefit if the deal were to be approved.”
The fact that “an absence of harm is not sufficient” likely means that Charter and TWC would have to “sweeten the deal” for regulators in order to win their approval. When Comcast bought NBC Universal in 2011, for example, it agreed to voluntary net-neutrality standards to win over the FCC.
Public-interest groups are already weighing in against the proposed acquisition.
“These potential mergers won’t make Charter as massive as a merged Comcast-Time Warner Cable would have been, but they raise similar public interest concerns, and the FCC should apply the lessons learned in its prior review here,” S. Derek Turner, research director at Free Press, said in a statement. “The issue of the cable industry’s power to harm online video competition, which is what ultimately sank Comcast’s consolidation plans, are very much at play in this deal.”
Illustration by Max Fleishman
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.