- Disney adds ‘Bob’s Burgers’ movie back to release schedule after accidentally yanking it 11 Months Ago
- Ocasio-Cortez launches petition demanding Stephen Miller’s resignation 11 Months Ago
- Prince Andrew’s defense against child sex crimes stokes conspiracy theory flames 11 Months Ago
- More people may be looking to cancel Disney+ than Netflix Today 1:09 PM
- Monday Night Football: How to stream Chiefs vs. Chargers live Today 1:00 PM
- After days of deadly protests, Iran implements ‘largest internet shutdown ever’ Today 12:55 PM
- ‘Disney Plus and thrust’ is apparently the new Netflix and Chill Today 12:32 PM
- Woman fired, sued after coworker shared their sexts Today 12:22 PM
- Group running GoFundMe for border wall breaks ground without permits Today 11:47 AM
- Biden says he won’t support federal legalization of marijuana Today 11:42 AM
- People can’t get enough of ‘Baby Yoda’ Today 11:41 AM
- ‘The Crown’ season 3 switches its cast but loses none of its intrigue Today 11:23 AM
- Protesters occupying Hong Kong university post last wishes to Twitter as police move in Today 11:19 AM
- Sara Lee navigates dirty Instagram comments after ‘SNL’ sketch Today 11:18 AM
- YouTuber David Dobrik says his monthly earnings dipped $273K after ‘adpocalypse’ Today 10:47 AM
Depending on where you live, a six-pack of Bud Light is unlikely to run you over $8.
It’s one of the cheaper beers out there, and it’s so relatively inexpensive that if the price went up by 50 cents, you’d both be unlikely to notice it or have it dramatically alter your decision to buy some.
Unless you’re a group of extremely online conservatives frothing to jump on any infringement on your God-given rights, even if they are just hypotheticals posited by news outlets suggesting a minor tax increase on alcohol as a way to save lives.
There are a lots of examples of the left being the new Puritans. This is just the latest one. Eat shit, vox https://t.co/mlZFIDQMbk— Jon von Gillern (@vongillern) December 14, 2018
It’s long been known that a tax on alcohol would have a positive effect on public health. Alcohol kills Americans at an alarming rate, and previous tax increases—such as mild price increase on alcohol in Illinois—have been effective at reducing deaths from drunk driving.
But when Vox published an article on Thursday about how a tax increase could prevent deaths, conservatives on Twitter flipped out.
“The literature is really overwhelming,” Alex Wagenaar, a researcher at Emory University who’s studied alcohol policy for years, told me. “The tax influences how much people buy and how much people drink, and that ripples then through to the burden of alcohol-related disease and injury on our society.”
Yet it sparked rage online, perceived as a Puritanical, progressive, socialist left attempting to infringe on these Twitter users’ alcohol consumption.
“Progressivism: Trying to stop some people from hurting themselves by making everything worse for everyone,” user Matt Clover wrote on Twitter.
Progressivism: Trying to stop some people from hurting themselves by making everything worse for everyone. https://t.co/zqWkUUqmn4— Matt Cover (@MattCover) December 14, 2018
As long as you have these types of democrats, you’ll never be without a momma and a daddy. https://t.co/wjIRmLL11O— Jeff Kemp (@jkempcpa) December 14, 2018
Everybody point and laugh at the new Puritans... https://t.co/m8jO9hHLDh— Jon Sobel (@jon_sobel) December 14, 2018
If you increase it by 10 dollars, you would save thousands more. Why does Vox want to let those people die? https://t.co/GUFwxmPaVI— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) December 14, 2018
Vox always knows what's best for you. https://t.co/Ta5KXKnfD1— Talmage Gross (@talmagegross) December 14, 2018
I have a better idea-tax the ever loving shit out of progressives, liberals & socialists. https://t.co/6mWmbdS1ZZ— BigDadio (@BigDadios) December 14, 2018
The response isn’t unexpected. In fact, it’s a microcosm of how we respond to a great number of societal ills.
Anytime someone proposes a solution for a problem plaguing society (drunk driving, gun violence) that requires the willful input of people who believe their individual behaviors aren’t part of the problem at large, they tend to flip out. Because that would be socialism or something.
David Covucci is the Layer 8 editor at the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the web. His work has appeared in Vice, the Huffington Post, Jezebel, Gothamist, and other publications. He is particularly interested in hearing any tips you have. Reach out at [email protected]