- Reddit Relationships: Man laughs at girlfriend for using Microsoft PowerPoint during sex Thursday 8:59 PM
- The 15 Brad Pitt movies you need to see now, ranked Thursday 8:26 PM
- Facebook could face legal action over the Area 51 event Thursday 6:50 PM
- How to stream Texans vs. Chargers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 6:40 PM
- Tekashi 69 alleges Cardi B was a Bloods gang member Thursday 5:55 PM
- Right-wing sites falsely claimed group of Somalis attacked man in viral video Thursday 5:00 PM
- Big creators risk losing checkmarks amid YouTube verification purge Thursday 4:56 PM
- How to stream Eagles vs. Lions in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:52 PM
- How to stream Steelers vs. 49ers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:10 PM
- How to stream Bills vs. Bengals in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:03 PM
- Colt halts production of AR-15s for civilians Thursday 3:45 PM
- If you love long-winded, hashtag-heavy Instagram captions, these apps can help Thursday 2:54 PM
- Teen girls on TikTok have convinced the internet that they eat their tampons Thursday 2:33 PM
- Twitch streamer faces criticism for trying to defend racist jokes Thursday 2:03 PM
- How to stream Raiders vs. Vikings in Week 3 Thursday 12:55 PM
Depending on where you live, a six-pack of Bud Light is unlikely to run you over $8.
It’s one of the cheaper beers out there, and it’s so relatively inexpensive that if the price went up by 50 cents, you’d both be unlikely to notice it or have it dramatically alter your decision to buy some.
Unless you’re a group of extremely online conservatives frothing to jump on any infringement on your God-given rights, even if they are just hypotheticals posited by news outlets suggesting a minor tax increase on alcohol as a way to save lives.
There are a lots of examples of the left being the new Puritans. This is just the latest one. Eat shit, vox https://t.co/mlZFIDQMbk— Jon von Gillern (@vongillern) December 14, 2018
It’s long been known that a tax on alcohol would have a positive effect on public health. Alcohol kills Americans at an alarming rate, and previous tax increases—such as mild price increase on alcohol in Illinois—have been effective at reducing deaths from drunk driving.
But when Vox published an article on Thursday about how a tax increase could prevent deaths, conservatives on Twitter flipped out.
“The literature is really overwhelming,” Alex Wagenaar, a researcher at Emory University who’s studied alcohol policy for years, told me. “The tax influences how much people buy and how much people drink, and that ripples then through to the burden of alcohol-related disease and injury on our society.”
Yet it sparked rage online, perceived as a Puritanical, progressive, socialist left attempting to infringe on these Twitter users’ alcohol consumption.
“Progressivism: Trying to stop some people from hurting themselves by making everything worse for everyone,” user Matt Clover wrote on Twitter.
Progressivism: Trying to stop some people from hurting themselves by making everything worse for everyone. https://t.co/zqWkUUqmn4— Matt Cover (@MattCover) December 14, 2018
As long as you have these types of democrats, you’ll never be without a momma and a daddy. https://t.co/wjIRmLL11O— Jeff Kemp (@jkempcpa) December 14, 2018
Everybody point and laugh at the new Puritans... https://t.co/m8jO9hHLDh— Jon Sobel (@jon_sobel) December 14, 2018
If you increase it by 10 dollars, you would save thousands more. Why does Vox want to let those people die? https://t.co/GUFwxmPaVI— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) December 14, 2018
Vox always knows what's best for you. https://t.co/Ta5KXKnfD1— Talmage Gross (@talmagegross) December 14, 2018
I have a better idea-tax the ever loving shit out of progressives, liberals & socialists. https://t.co/6mWmbdS1ZZ— BigDadio (@BigDadios) December 14, 2018
The response isn’t unexpected. In fact, it’s a microcosm of how we respond to a great number of societal ills.
Anytime someone proposes a solution for a problem plaguing society (drunk driving, gun violence) that requires the willful input of people who believe their individual behaviors aren’t part of the problem at large, they tend to flip out. Because that would be socialism or something.
David Covucci is the Layer 8 editor at the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the web. His work has appeared in Vice, the Huffington Post, Jezebel, Gothamist, and other publications. He is particularly interested in hearing any tips you have. Reach out at [email protected]