- Game developer Chucklefish accused of whitewashing characters of color Monday 5:22 PM
- Apple TV’s ‘Hala’ is a silent explosion of a coming-of-age film Monday 5:20 PM
- This new video game apparently lets you play Jesus Monday 4:02 PM
- Golden toilet creator sells world’s most expensive banana—only for another artist to eat it Monday 3:24 PM
- This new Chinese video game lets players attack Hong Kong protesters Monday 3:05 PM
- These TikTok videos that recreate NPC interactions from Skyrim are honestly incredible Monday 2:40 PM
- John Legend defends pro-consent ‘Baby It’s Cold Outside’ lyrics Monday 2:38 PM
- Video shows UC Berkeley student using racial slurs, making homophobic comments Monday 2:36 PM
- New video reveals Brother Nature instigated sandwich shop fight Monday 2:06 PM
- Lizzo’s thong dress breaks the internet Monday 1:25 PM
- Pixel Buds 2 or Apple AirPods 2: Which are right for you? Monday 1:09 PM
- It’s 2019: Make your holiday cards online, for free this year Monday 12:47 PM
- Fighting over the ‘Marriage Story’ fight scene becomes a meme Monday 12:41 PM
- ‘Trump is innocent!’: InfoWars correspondent interrupts impeachment hearing Monday 12:12 PM
- Video shows runner smacking reporter’s butt on live TV Monday 11:46 AM
The rise of the pro-police #BlueLivesMatter movement
This is certainly one way to be pro-police.
After two New York police officers were murdered in Brooklyn on Saturday, the pro-police movement that has staunchly resisted calls to examine police brutality in recent weeks found itself in the perfect position to fight back.
The deaths of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., and Eric Garner in New York City have led to massive nationwide protests and galvanized a new movement pushing for greater police accountability. Brown and Garner are among the most widely known victims of police violence, but poorly trained and poorly supervised officers have wantonly killed unarmed black men in many other American cities in recent years. The events of the past few months were merely the catalyst for a loosely organized protest movement that recently united under the slogan “Black Lives Matter.”
For the people who have consistently given these mostly white police officers the benefit of the doubt, the moral high ground has been frustratingly elusive. That changed on Saturday, however, when the country paused to mourn the loss of officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos, who were brutally gunned down in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, while sitting in their patrol car.
Ismaaiyl Abdullah Brinsley, the 28-year-old who allegedly murdered the NYPD officers, committed suicide after shooting them. In an Instagram caption prior to the shooting, Brinsley alluded to the death of Garner, writing, “I’m Putting Wings On Pigs Today. They Take 1 Of Ours … Let’s Take 2 Of Theirs.”
In the aftermath of Liu and Ramos’ deaths, law enforcement’s most ardent defenders on Twitter started using the #BlueLivesMatter hashtag to counter the sentiments being advanced by the anti-police-brutality protesters. Embedded in the #BlueLivesMatter campaign is the narrative that the #BlackLivesMatter movement is denigrating and endangering police officers with its rhetoric, further deteriorating the public’s respect for the police.
#BlueLivesMatter has gained prominence in part because of several of its supporters’ arguments, which are indicative of the overt frustration felt by those who support police action.
Here is a tweet from someone living in what he calls “REAL America,” who suggested that the entire New York City police force abandon their posts on one of the city’s busiest nights.
Most of the people tweeting with the #BlueLivesMatter hashtag express seemingly contradictory political beliefs. They are fiercely conservative, yet unwaveringly loyal to the police, an iconic symbol of government authority. They believe that American law enforcement officers are unfairly criticized, and that protests in Ferguson and elsewhere receive unduly favorable media coverage due to a combination of liberal bias and political correctness.
These pro-law-enforcement activists have several core goals. To understand #BlueLivesMatter, it is essential to recognize their objectives.
Greater respect for police officers
Few words have seeped as deeply into the #BlueLivesMatter rhetoric as the word “respect.”
When Nick Mangold, a football player with the New York Jets, was spotted wearing a NYPD hat during Sunday’s game against the New England Patriots, the #BlueLivesMatter crowd turned him into an icon of their movement.
The belief that police officers suffer from a respect deficit is not born out by the evidence. Gallup polling data from 2006 to 2014 shows that 57 percent of Americans have “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in the police. The racial divide on this question, however, is stark: 61 percent of whites express that sentiment while only 34 percent of African-Americans share it. Among African-Americans living in “highly urban areas,” Gallup found, only 26 percent said they had this level of confidence in the police.
Meanwhile, even though overall respect for the police remains high, neither blacks nor whites really expect the police to treat people of different races equally. In a November 2014 study by the Pew Research Center, 35 percent of whites said they had a great deal of confidence in equal treatment by police regardless of racism; only 17 percent of blacks said the same thing.
Widespread respect for the police already exists in the United States. So, too, does widespread recognition that police departments are tinged with racial biases. Unfortunately, the pro-law-enforcement crowd, which appears to be mostly white, largely ignores evidence that these biases manifest in consequential ways.
An end to anti-police-brutality protests
Many #BlueLivesMatter supporters have used the tragic and barbaric shooting of the two NYPD officers to suggest, both overtly and subtly, that the protests over the deaths of Brown, Garner, and other black victims were misguided, and that the real anger ought to be directed at cop-killers rather than killer cops.
The resignation of NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio
On Saturday evening, Pat Lynch, the head of the New York City police union, said, “There’s blood on many hands tonight. That blood on the hands starts at City Hall in the Office of the Mayor.” When de Blasio arrived at the hospital where the officers’ bodies had been sent, Lynch and his officers turned their backs on the mayor in an unprecedented sign of disrespect.
The blood of 2 executed police officers is on the hands of Mayor de Blasio. May God bless their families and may they rest in peace.
— SBA (@SBANYPD) December 21, 2014
It’s unsurprising, then, that many in the #BlueLivesMatter community are calling for the resignation of Mayor de Blasio.
A MoveOn.org petition calling for de Blasio’s resignation had roughly 60,000 signatures at press time. The petition concludes that de Blasio is “unfit to have a relationship with his police department for his remaining tenure and he should be taken out of office IMMEDIATELY.”
The firing of MSNBC host Al Sharpton
After Mayor de Blasio, the single biggest target of the #BlueLivesMatter crowd is Rev. Al Sharpton, who hosts the nightly MSNBC program PoliticsNation. Anger at Sharpton takes many forms, from calling him The Real Racist…
…to suggesting that he empathize with fellow death-threat recipient Darren Wilson, who killed Brown…
…to graphic posters that literally place the blood of the slain officers on him…
…to bizarre accusations that he has himself committed murder.
There are also some calling for MSNBC to fire Sharpton.
At the core of the #BlueLivesMatter movement is the belief that the American Left is tearing the country apart and fomenting unrest. In the tweets of these aggrieved conservatives, police-violence critics have found glimmers of the backlash to the civil rights movement, when supporters of segregation seized on any violence or mayhem as an excuse to condemn civil rights demonstrators’ political goals.
As much as #BlueLivesMatter has latched onto the senseless killings of Officers Liu and Ramos, it’s far from certain that the two men would have endorsed the rhetoric that sprung up to supposedly honor them—though the movement’s supporters would likely say the same thing of Brown and Garner.
Photo via Corey Leopold/Flickr (CC BY 2.0) | Remix by Jason Reed
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.