- How to (legally) stream live TV on Kodi 2 Years Ago
- ‘Delhi Crime’ tackles inequality and women’s rights 2 Years Ago
- How to watch the 2019 STP 500 at Martinsville Speedway for free Today 6:00 AM
- These high school theater kids put on a totally awesome ‘Alien’ play Saturday 3:59 PM
- Behold these photos of Elon Musk, but with Elizabeth Holmes’ eyes Saturday 3:11 PM
- Barbra Streisand gets canceled over remarks about Michael Jackson’s alleged victims Saturday 2:09 PM
- Report: Florida man raped Texas teen after posing as Instagram celeb Saturday 12:14 PM
- Lori Loughlin’s daughters, Olivia and Isabella, could be banned from USC forever Saturday 11:46 AM
- ‘Starfish’ is a heartbreaking tale of BFFs, grief, and apocalyptic alien invasions Saturday 10:35 AM
- How to stream UFC Fight Night 148 for free Saturday 10:00 AM
- The kids are making scantron memes instead of studying Saturday 9:29 AM
- Every installment of Hulu’s ‘Into the Dark,’ ranked Saturday 6:00 AM
- The internet is mocking Robert Mueller’s report deadline Friday 7:53 PM
- Instagram blocks some anti-vax hashtags—but still has far to go Friday 6:20 PM
- Study: Netflix released more originals than licensed titles last year Friday 2:26 PM
‘This deal would mean higher prices and fewer choices for the American people.’
The Vermont senator and 2016 Democratic presidential candidate on Sunday called on the Obama administration to stop AT&T’s $85.4 billion purchase of Time Warner.
The mega-acquisition, announced Sunday morning, would radically transform the digital market landscape. If the deal goes through, AT&T—already America’s largest pay-TV provider, second largest wireless service provider, and third largest internet provider—would own one of the largest producers of television, film and video games, including subsidiaries HBO, CNN, and Warner Bros.
The AT&T–Time Warner merger, in other words, would put a single company in control of much of the content we consume and the ways that content is delivered—a recipe that critics believe will ultimately hurt consumers and threaten net neutrality by limiting what customers can access over its networks. As such, the deal stands to face intense scrutiny from federal regulators.
“I’m skeptical of huge media mergers because they can lead to higher costs, fewer choices, and even worse service for consumers,” wrote Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) in a Facebook post on Saturday, after news of the merger first broke.
The campaigns of both Republican nominee Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton have also spoken out on the deal. Trump said it would “destroy democracy,” while Clinton running mate Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said he was “pro-competition.”
The Department of Justice’s antitrust division will review the buyout, and the Federal Communications Commission may also have its say, depending on which assets AT&T acquires.
The deal is expected to be finalized by the end of 2017—if AT&T’s lobbyists can survive the fight ahead.
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.