- Tom Holland rescues fan getting squashed by autograph hounds Tuesday 7:14 PM
- What is incel ‘Chadfishing’? Tuesday 6:36 PM
- Facebook to give France data on users suspected of hate speech Tuesday 5:29 PM
- This 89-year-old man is stunned by all the technology around him—in 1930 Tuesday 5:21 PM
- Wayfair refuses to stop furnishing migrant detention centers Tuesday 4:48 PM
- Woah! How did Keanu Reeves get so small? Tuesday 4:37 PM
- The centrist argument against Sanders’ student loan plan is getting ripped apart Tuesday 4:08 PM
- Jonathan Frakes confirms that you’re right in yet another meme Tuesday 3:56 PM
- Meryl Streep, Ariana Grande set to star in Netflix’s ‘The Prom’ Tuesday 3:35 PM
- ‘Stranger Things’ Season 3 goodies are here just in time Tuesday 3:01 PM
- Kim Kardashian’s shapewear line Kimono is already getting called out Tuesday 2:11 PM
- ‘Aggretsuko’ tones down the rage in season 2 Tuesday 1:13 PM
- TikTok is being used to call out predators Tuesday 12:41 PM
- Republican congressman wants to defund PBS over the gay rat wedding Tuesday 12:39 PM
- Elizabeth Warren calls for sweeping overhaul of U.S. elections Tuesday 11:47 AM
Someone’s having a bad day.
You should never blame the victim—but sometimes, it’s hard not to point a finger in their general direction.
An $81 million bank heist, perpetrated by hacking into the networks of Bangladesh’s central bank, was made easier because the bank used second-hand $10 routers to connect to global financial networks and neglected to use a firewall for security, Reuters reports.
The hackers tried to take nearly $1 billion from Bangladesh Bank in February 2016 but succeeded in taking only a fraction of that amount due to mistakes made.
A firewall would have made the heist “difficult,” Mohammad Shah Alam, a forensic investigator on the Bangladeshi investigative team, told Reuters. The cheap routers, then, hamstrung the investigation because they collected so little network data.
A more capable router could have cost hundreds of dollars.
When hackers gained access to Bangladesh Bank’s network, they transferred cash from Bangladesh’s account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Some $100 million was traced to Sri Lanka and the Philippines. Over $20 million was recovered, but $81 million remains out of hand.
What finally stopped the thieves from getting away with the full billion-dollar haul was a spelling mistake on the fraudulent transfer orders that flagged the heist for the bank staff that was, until then, completely ignorant of the mass siphoning of cash going on under their noses and through their network.
No one involved in the heist has been accused, identified, or caught.
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.