- The Hatebook: Inside Facebook’s thriving subculture of racism Today 7:29 AM
- Anthony Hamilton’s national anthem at All-Star game sparks MVP meme Today 7:02 AM
- ‘Subtle Asian Dating’ is the un-Tinder we all need right now Today 5:00 AM
- Man delighted to find 30-year-old computer still works Sunday 5:32 PM
- Report: Google used shell companies to build data centers, obtain tax breaks Sunday 3:38 PM
- Grammy winner Kacey Musgraves spoiled ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars 4’ Sunday 2:24 PM
- Conservatives feel vindicated by new developments in Jussie Smollett case (updated) Sunday 12:19 PM
- Don Cheadle made important fashion choices on ‘SNL’ Sunday 9:47 AM
- Why the Twitter left loves to dunk on Max Boot Sunday 6:30 AM
- How to watch ‘Last Week Tonight with John Oliver’ online for free Sunday 6:30 AM
- How to stream Francis Ngannou vs. Cain Velasquez for free Sunday 6:00 AM
- How to stream the 2019 Daytona 500 for free Sunday 5:50 AM
- 7-year-old YouTuber to get his own show on Nickelodeon Saturday 5:30 PM
- ‘Hipster’ jobs are trending, and Indeed says the market is booming Saturday 3:33 PM
- Trump meme removed after copyright complaint Saturday 2:15 PM
The fight over unlocking a terrorism suspect’s iPhone is getting even more public.
FBI Director James Comey, Apple Senior Vice President and General Counsel Bruce Sewell, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr., and Worcester Polytechnic Institute cybersecurity policy professor Susan Landau will all testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
The issue at hand is whether Apple should be required to comply with a court order demanding it create custom software that allows FBI investigators to flood the iPhone of San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook with password guesses.
Apple has filed a motion to vacate the court order, arguing that writing the software the FBI wants would violate its rights, among other legal objections. The FBI says Apple should have to comply with a valid court order. Both parties agree that Congress should ultimately clarify the issue through legislation.
The House Judiciary Committee hearing will not decide who’s right. Instead, the hearing is simply an opportunity for members of Congress (and the American people) to gain insight into what’s at stake.
The witnesses have each submitted their own written testimony, which will be presented at the opening of the hearing:
Following the opening testimonies, members of the Judiciary Committee (which is made up of 23 Republicans and 16 Democrats) will ask each witness questions reflecting their expertise—and that’s where things could get interesting.
Illustration via Max Fleishman
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.