- Rotten Tomatoes wants to see your ticket stub to leave a verified review 3 Years Ago
- ‘Sonic the Hedgehog’ movie delayed to 2020 to fix his look 3 Years Ago
- ‘Swamp Thing’ gets off to a promising start, but can it tell a convincing love story? Today 11:34 AM
- ‘Falling on deaf ears’: ‘Queer Eye’ star sparks conversation about ableist idioms Today 11:15 AM
- Parents are spending thousands on YouTube camps that teach kids how to be famous Today 10:43 AM
- In season 2 of ‘She’s Gotta Have It,’ Spike Lee remains unapologetically himself Today 10:36 AM
- Trump selling Pride shirts is a grotesque insult to the LGBTQ community Today 10:27 AM
- Logan Paul is being mocked for pulling out of slapping competition Today 9:57 AM
- 47 House Democrats sign criticized net neutrality working group letter Today 9:17 AM
- How ‘and I oop’ became the perfect reaction meme for shocking developments Today 8:47 AM
- Netflix’s ‘The Perfection’ is a totally unhinged, WTF horror film Today 8:00 AM
- ‘After Maria’ looks at the long road to recovery after Hurricane Maria Today 7:30 AM
- ‘Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic’ movie is reportedly in the works Today 7:04 AM
- Why do conservatives hate Ocasio-Cortez’s community garden? Today 6:30 AM
- What happens to Hawkeye’s Disney+ spinoff after ‘Avengers: Endgame’? Today 6:30 AM
The fight over unlocking a terrorism suspect’s iPhone is getting even more public.
FBI Director James Comey, Apple Senior Vice President and General Counsel Bruce Sewell, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr., and Worcester Polytechnic Institute cybersecurity policy professor Susan Landau will all testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
The issue at hand is whether Apple should be required to comply with a court order demanding it create custom software that allows FBI investigators to flood the iPhone of San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook with password guesses.
Apple has filed a motion to vacate the court order, arguing that writing the software the FBI wants would violate its rights, among other legal objections. The FBI says Apple should have to comply with a valid court order. Both parties agree that Congress should ultimately clarify the issue through legislation.
The House Judiciary Committee hearing will not decide who’s right. Instead, the hearing is simply an opportunity for members of Congress (and the American people) to gain insight into what’s at stake.
The witnesses have each submitted their own written testimony, which will be presented at the opening of the hearing:
Following the opening testimonies, members of the Judiciary Committee (which is made up of 23 Republicans and 16 Democrats) will ask each witness questions reflecting their expertise—and that’s where things could get interesting.
Illustration via Max Fleishman
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.