- Hulu’s ‘Into the Dark’ scores with Christmas-themed ‘A Nasty Piece of Work’ Today 6:00 AM
- West Virginia corrections employees suspended after Nazi salute photo surfaces Thursday 8:02 PM
- Here are the 15 best Eddie Murphy movies available to stream Thursday 7:56 PM
- Ex-InfoWars video editor admits to making up Islamophobic stories Thursday 6:55 PM
- WhatsApp accounts deleted amid Kashmir internet blackout Thursday 6:21 PM
- Guy gets mocked for tattoo of Baby Yoda drinking White Claw Thursday 6:18 PM
- Spotify Wrapped has people asking just how much it knows about us Thursday 5:50 PM
- Instagram account allegedly asked for inappropriate photos of children Thursday 5:16 PM
- How to stream ‘Boys vs. Bears on Thursday Night Football Thursday 4:33 PM
- Woman caught her boyfriend cheating through his Fitbit Thursday 4:29 PM
- The Pete Buttigieg ‘High Hopes’ dance was designed by an intern Thursday 4:17 PM
- TikTok admits to hiding content made by fat, LGBTQ, and disabled users Thursday 3:58 PM
- ‘Merry Happy Whatever’ is an unoriginal sitcom with plenty of holiday cheer Thursday 3:55 PM
- The ‘Pod Save America’ Bros are losing it over Joe Biden’s newest ad Thursday 3:28 PM
- Van Halen had a wholesome response in defense of Billie Eilish Thursday 3:15 PM
Wikipedia seeks new writers
The site is looking abroad for more contributors. Why not fix its well-known problems first?
Wikipedia is in need of new writers and believes its future lies abroad, said cofounder Jimmy Wales at the site’s annual conference this week.
Launched in 2001 by Wales, a former bond trader and entrepreneur, the user-written encyclopedia wants to get 5,000 more volunteer contributors by June 2012 to help replenish its ranks.
“It is not a crisis, but I consider it to be important,” Wales told the Associated Press Thursday.
What’s equally important is tweaking the site to make it easier for people to post and edit entries, Wales said.
The number of active contributors on the site hovers around 90,000. But newcomers have often been greeted with hostility or indifference by the site’s more established editors, many of whom pride themselves on their mastery of arcane rules, knowledge of obscure abbreviations, and patience for extended arguments over seemingly picayune matters.
So Wikipedia is stepping up its efforts to recruit writers at universities in Canada, India and Brazil. But is this really necessary when Wikipedia could easily double its contributor base by becoming a more inclusive community?
According to a well-publicized study commissioned by the company, about 12.5 percent of the editors are women. The encyclopedia would like to raise that number to 25 percent by 2015, reported the New York Times.
Women feel editors are misogynistic, too argumentative and overtly sexual, wrote Sue Gardner in her February blog post called “Nine Reasons Women Don’t Edit Wikipedia (in their own words.)” Garnder is the executive director for the Wikimedia Foundation. Her list was drawn from a variety of responses on websites like Feministing and MetaFilter.
“One hostile-to-women thing about Wikipedia I have noticed is that if a movie has a rape scene in it, the Wiki article will often say it was a sex scene,” wrote bewilderbeast on MetaFilter. “When people try to change it, editors change it back and note that unlike ‘sex,’ the word ‘rape’ is not neutral, so it should be left out.”
Looking to recruit writers in foreign countries is a novel idea but unless Wikipedia can find a way to address these concerns, growth will be stunted, or nonexistent.
And it’s going to take more than some fancy Facebook-like gifts called Wikilove for women to join in.
Fernando Alfonso III served as an early Reddit and 4chan reporter and the Daily Dot’s first art director until 2016. He’s gone on to report at Lexington’s Herald-Leader and at the Houston Chronicle.