- Lizzo’s thong dress breaks the internet 8 Years Ago
- Pixel Buds 2 or Apple AirPods 2: Which are right for you? 8 Years Ago
- It’s 2019: Make your holiday cards online, for free this year 8 Years Ago
- Fighting over the ‘Marriage Story’ fight scene becomes a meme 8 Years Ago
- ‘Trump is innocent!’: InfoWars correspondent interrupts impeachment hearing Today 12:12 PM
- Video shows runner smacking reporter’s butt on live TV Today 11:46 AM
- 27 senators call on Trump to fire Stephen Miller Today 11:13 AM
- Conservatives are fighting over whether porn is OK Today 10:39 AM
- The best in tech gifts for women this year Today 10:39 AM
- Why do the Golden Globes keep sidelining women filmmakers? Today 10:37 AM
- Netflix dominates with 34 Golden Globe nominations across TV and film Today 10:27 AM
- Ethan Klein has declared war on K-pop—and K-pop fans Today 10:22 AM
- People are not happy with Steve Harvey’s cartel comment to Miss Colombia Today 10:21 AM
- The decade conspiracy theories overtook the truth Today 9:14 AM
- Marianne Williamson duped into believing Trump pardoned Charles Manson Today 8:55 AM
How a Twitter user potentially caused a mistrial for a death-row inmate
The Arkansas Supreme Court has called for a mistrial after a juror reportedly tweeted four times during the trial.
The trial of a death-row inmate has been suspended after a juror reportedly tweeted at least four different times.
Erickson Dimas-Martinez was on trial for 2010 the murder of Derrick Jefferson, 17, when the court discovered that juror number 2, Randy Franco, was found to be tweeting about the proceedings, reported CBS News and The Wall Street Journal.
The Arkansas Supreme Court has since called for a mistrial.
“Because of the very nature of Twitter as an … online social media site, Juror 2’s tweets about the trial were very much public discussions,” wrote Associate Justice Donald Corbin. “Even if such discussions were one-sided, it is in no way appropriate for a juror to state musings, thoughts, or other information about a case in such a public fashion.”
Franco reportedly sent the following tweets, some which were sent even after being told specifically told not use the microblogging platform:
- “Choices to be made. Hearts to be broken…We each define the great line.”
- “The coffee here sucks.”
- “Court. Day 5. here we go again.”
- “It’s over.”
None of the articles linked specifically to Franco’s Twitter account, and the Daily Dot was unable to find the account online. It’s possible that the user account either changed his username or logged off the service entirely.
This was not the only case of jury misconduct in the trial of Dimas-Martinez. According to a legal brief, another juror “fell asleep during the guilt phase of the trial.”
This isn’t the first instance of jury misconduct via social media. During an Arkansas trial in 2009, “a Washington County judge dismissed an attempt to overturn a $12.6 million judgment against a building materials company, despite the firm’s complaint that a juror’s Twitter posts showed bias,” reported CBS. Earlier this year in England, “a Manchester woman became the first juror to be jailed for contacting a defendant via Facebook,” reported the BBC.
With the continued proliferation of social media, and its ease of use, the court system is going to have to keep a closer eye on jurors—especially since it only takes less than 140 characters to topple a case.
Photo by Brian Lane Winfield Moore; illustration by Fernando Alfonso III
Fernando Alfonso III served as an early Reddit and 4chan reporter and the Daily Dot’s first art director until 2016. He’s gone on to report at Lexington’s Herald-Leader and at the Houston Chronicle.