- The 16-inch MacBook Pro is a beast, and it has a decent keyboard 2 Years Ago
- This group is scanning thousands of faces in Congress today to protest facial recognition 2 Years Ago
- Why everyone is debating Pete Buttigieg’s Medicare for All stance? 2 Years Ago
- The Motorola Razr is a foldable homage to millennial nostalgia Today 10:22 AM
- The ‘I’m baby’ meme gets much more literal on TikTok Today 10:20 AM
- MrDeadMoth avoids jail time for assaulting pregnant partner during live stream Today 9:21 AM
- Deval Patrick 2020 fever is not catching on Today 9:08 AM
- How to stream Steelers vs. Browns on Thursday Night Football Today 8:13 AM
- How to stream Mexico vs. Netherlands in the U-17 World Cup semis Today 6:46 AM
- ‘Waves’ wrestles with the family drama and breaks it in half Today 6:30 AM
- QAnon-touting congressman sneaks ‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’ into tweets Wednesday 7:12 PM
- Ocasio-Cortez met a famous drag queen–and the right melted down Wednesday 6:09 PM
- Woman says Lyft driver tried to kidnap her Wednesday 5:18 PM
- Debunking the right-wing conspiracy theories from the impeachment hearing Wednesday 4:29 PM
- Maroon 5 approves of the latest TikTok trend Wednesday 3:54 PM
On Tuesday, tech journalist Quinn Norton was named to the New York Times’ editorial board as its new lead opinion writer covering tech. However, it didn’t take long for Twitter users to point out a series of tweets from Norton in which she used racist and homophobic slurs, prompting the print publication to let her go hours later.
Norton has had an immense influence on tech journalism, serving both as a writer for Wired as well as Gizmodo and the Atlantic. But shortly after the Times announced her hire on Tuesday, her friendship with American neo-Nazi Andrew “weev” Auernheimer came to light. She previously called him “an old friend of mine,” defending her connection with him while admitting he is “terrible.”
This already didn’t sit well with the internet, especially in light of a column she wrote on the moral complexity of John Rabe, a Nazi Party member who helped Chinese citizens escape Japanese war atrocities. Then people unearthed tweets in which Norton used homophobic and racist slurs. Particularly, she openly used the N-word during an analogy on terrorism, retweeted a joke with the N-word about President Obama, and repeatedly used the words “fag” and “faggot” in conversation with others during 2013 and 2014.
“Here’s the deal, faggot,” Norton wrote in one tweet from 2013. “Free speech comes with responsibility. not legal, but human. grown up. you can do this.”
@EatingMyPeaz at this point, as far as I'm concerned no one is a terrorist, in exactly the same way no human being is a nigger.— Well that was fun. (@quinnnorton) October 31, 2013
@VizFoSho here's the deal, faggot: free speech comes with responsibility. not legal, but human. grown up. you can do this.— Well that was fun. (@quinnnorton) July 27, 2013
What a shocker, garbage human and useful idiot for the hard right, @Timcast, defends a racist garbage human the #NYT has hired as an opinion columnist.— Repeal The Iona 'Institute' (@eminentgent) February 14, 2018
"Quinn [Norton] is awesome." - Tim Pool pic.twitter.com/hDANYGqR2F
Quinn Norton can go back to racist, homophobic Neo-Nazi hell she came from. Bye. pic.twitter.com/2jlnoofPDl— victor mirnoff (@VictorMirnoff) February 14, 2018
Shortly after Norton’s tweets surfaced, the New York Times said it was “very concerned” with her statements, vowing to investigate them. This eventually led the Times to let her go.
“Despite our review of Quinn Norton’s work and our conversations with her previous employers, this was new information to us,” Times editorial page editor James Bennet said in an official statement. “Based on it, we’ve decided to go our separate ways.”
The following is attributable to James Bennet, editorial page editor, The New York Times:— The New York Times Communications (@NYTimesPR) February 14, 2018
"Despite our review of Quinn Norton’s work and our conversations with her previous employers, this was new information to us. Based on it, we’ve decided to go our separate ways." pic.twitter.com/ZtQnq0MLF8
Norton’s career at the Times may be incredibly short-lived, but her hiring continues to cause an online stir, with many Twitter users complaining that the American print publication didn’t look deep enough into Norton’s background before bringing her on. Many are left wondering whether the Times has made the same mistake with other editorial staff members, too.
I can’t believe people are going after Quinn Norton by digging up her old Nazi-sympathizing tweets from...— Delete Your Account (@deleteuracct) February 13, 2018
...three hours ago. pic.twitter.com/SUpFkppmdF
For the record, I was a fan of @quinnnorton's writing and reporting -- and then I read her tweets about weev and neo-nazis.— Christopher Farnsworth (@chrisfarnsworth) February 13, 2018
I have met and reported on neo-nazis. They're not not misunderstood. They're not rebels.
They mean what they say, and they want to kill people.
Anyone cheering the hiring of Quinn Norton -- we have issues. yes, it matters who your friends are.— Natasha Lennard (@natashalennard) February 13, 2018
If NY Times wants to offer some minority opinions why not offer actual minorities’ a chance to voice their opinions or give a voice to the poor or rural or literally any one else who doesn’t have a voice.— Charmel Cross (@CharmelCross) February 14, 2018
Some believe Norton’s hiring follows a longer legacy in which the Times purposefully hires far-right thinkers who espouse harmful ideas and skew facts to stir controversy and garner clicks.
Quinn Norton's flaws aside, there's no sane argument for jettisoning her and keeping Bret Stephens https://t.co/bwYUiG9wDp— Elon Green (@elongreen) February 14, 2018
NYT Opinion Page: Hey everyone! Please welcome Bret Stephens. He'll be writing about defending Woody Allen, why climate change isn't real, and other useless dipshittery.— Eoin Higgins (@EoinHiggins_) February 13, 2018
Readers: We hate this.
NYT Opinion Page: Hey everyone! Please welcome Quinn Norton. She'll be writing about
Why interview nazi sympathizers when you can hire one amirite NYT— Ariel (@arieljrob1) February 13, 2018
Others compared her short-but-controversial tenor to another outspoken firebrand.
By my very rough math, Quinn Norton lasted @ the New York Times approximately 0.025 of a Scaramucci— Emma Schützkowski (@emmaschuetz) February 14, 2018
Norton has since changed her Twitter display name to “Well that was fun,” defending her tweets and saying there is “no harm no foul” toward the Times for dropping her.
“I’m sorry I can’t do the work I wanted to do with them,” she tweeted last night. “I wish there had been a way, but ultimately, they need to feel safe with how the net will react to their opinion writers.”
Ana Valens is a reporter specializing in online queer communities, marginalized identities, and adult content creation. She is Daily Dot's Trans/Sex columnist. Her work has appeared at Vice, Vox, Truthout, Bitch Media, Kill Screen, Rolling Stone, and the Toast. She lives in Brooklyn, New York, and spends her free time developing queer adult games.