- Is that Rosa Parks in random Twitter user’s baby photo? Tuesday 8:24 PM
- Syracuse students say white supremacist manifesto was AirDropped to them Tuesday 7:44 PM
- Florida woman gets prison time for throwing slushie at Matt Gaetz Tuesday 6:28 PM
- Marie Kondo’s online store slammed for selling clutter-worthy products Tuesday 5:34 PM
- People are rallying against toxic masculinity on International Men’s Day Tuesday 4:42 PM
- Reddit wants to stop its pro-Trump forum from outing the alleged whistleblower Tuesday 3:38 PM
- White woman calls cops on man who said he was visiting aunt with his kids Tuesday 3:12 PM
- ‘The Stranded’ is a flawed yet addictive blend of ‘Degrassi’ and ‘Lost’ Tuesday 2:45 PM
- The ‘gonna tell my kids’ meme is revisionist history at its most absurd Tuesday 2:24 PM
- Redditor asks former burglars to give home security tips Tuesday 2:18 PM
- Facebook-Breitbart partnership under fire in wake of new Stephen Miller emails Tuesday 2:00 PM
- John Krasinski under fire after praising the CIA Tuesday 1:46 PM
- Conservatives melt down after Chick-fil-A says it will stop donating to anti-LGBTQ orgs Tuesday 1:33 PM
- ‘Honey Boy’ is an experimental look at channeling trauma Tuesday 1:28 PM
- Disney+ now allows users to resume and restart content Tuesday 11:42 AM
In a vote furthering anti-abortion provisions in the state, the Missouri House voted on Tuesday to roll back a St. Louis ban on employers and landlords from discriminating against people on the basis of reproductive health choices.
The ban, which St. Louis passed in the spring, was called “radical” by Gov. Eric Greitens, who said it was an effort to make St. Louis “an abortion sanctuary city.”
According to Feministing, the rollback would make it possible for women who use birth control, who have had an abortion, or who are pregnant out of wedlock to be fired or evicted for these choices.
The bill, Senate Bill 5, was passed by the Missouri Senate last Wednesday, and later amended by the House to include more anti-abortion restrictions before Tuesday’s vote.
According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and St. Louis Public Radio, SB5 also includes another slew of anti-abortion measures, such as: providers must send fetal tissue samples to pathologists within five days; abortion clinics must undergo unannounced annual inspections; abortion clinics cannot request ambulances respond to medical emergencies without using sirens or flashing lights; limiting regulation of anti-choice crisis pregnancy centers; giving the attorney general the ability to prosecute abortion law violators without notifying local prosecutors; and requiring doctors to inform abortion patients about the medical risks associated with abortion 72 hours before a procedure.
As Feministing points out, the Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act already prevents employers from discriminating against women who have or have considered abortion, but federal protections for birth control users are less clear.
However, there is some hope that the House’s amendments won’t come to fruition. According to Rewire, the changes that House leadership made to SB5 could leave the legislation at a standstill, creating a “stand off” between the House and the Senate.
“This feels like a political stunt to many of us,” Rep. Peter Merideth (D-St. Louis) told the radio station. “It’s being sold as an effort to show how pro-life the governor is.”
“If the governor puts enough pressure on House leadership to change the bill and make it better, but the Senate won’t come to conference, then the bill will actually die,” Rep. Tracy McCreery (D-Olivette) told Rewire.
Samantha Grasso is a former IRL staff writer for the Daily Dot with a reporting emphasis on immigration. Her work has appeared on Los Angeles Magazine, Death And Taxes, Revelist, Texts From Last Night, Austin Monthly, and she has previously contributed to Texas Monthly.