- Cardi B says she drugged, robbed men in her past on Instagram Live Monday 8:03 PM
- Twitter thread roasts bathtub tray ads for women Monday 7:21 PM
- Nintendo set to release two new models of the Switch—possibly in 2019 Monday 6:45 PM
- Viral cat video ‘Dear Kitten’ finds new life in TikTok challenge Monday 5:30 PM
- Here’s every show that was announced at the Apple TV+ kickoff Monday 3:53 PM
- ‘Shazam!’ embraces the spectacle and heart of the superhero genre Monday 3:45 PM
- How to mute Twitter’s suggested tweets on your timeline Monday 3:02 PM
- What you need to know about Apple’s new streaming service Monday 2:32 PM
- Text-message fanfiction is taking over Instagram Monday 1:54 PM
- Your Asus computer might have a secret backdoor Monday 1:06 PM
- Trump is already fundraising off the Mueller report—even though no one’s seen it Monday 1:01 PM
- Michael Avenatti charged with trying to extort $20 million from Nike Monday 12:51 PM
- Logan Paul says being a YouTuber is ‘wack’ Monday 12:14 PM
- James Comey posts from a forest in wake of Mueller report Monday 10:35 AM
- These are the only online dating sites worth your time Monday 10:29 AM
Milo Yiannopoulos is now his own lawyer—and the internet is roasting his case
Things are not going well for the former Breitbart editor.
Noted far-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos became the laughing stock of the internet after the first draft of his canceled Simon & Schuster book, Dangerous, leaked with some pretty harsh editorial feedback. Now, new documents from the New York County Clerk reveal Yiannopoulos’ lawsuit against the book publisher has taken an interesting turn.
Yiannopoulos has become his own attorney.
Last month, Yiannopoulos was in court officially withdrawing his law firm, Meister Seelig & Fein, from representing him. This turned the far-right figure into his own legal representative in court.
Why dismiss his counsel? Well, Yiannopoulos partly attributes that to a “break-down between me and my representatives.” But he also highlights another reason. Apparently, Simon & Schuster turned over certain documents to Yiannopoulos’ law firm for his counsel to study, but could not be seen by Yiannopoulos himself. This ended up taking precedent throughout the January proceeding, as Yiannopoulos demanded the court give him permission to view the documents.
“There is no reason why I should not be given access to documents that are absolutely essential in order for me to properly assess my own case,” Yiannopoulos told the court.
To which Judge Barry R. Ostrager responded, “That’s not going to happen.”
Milo being his own lawyer is going great pic.twitter.com/1GCuB7OdKr
— Jose Gabriel Montelongo-Mendez (@flyinthebottle) February 7, 2018
Ostrager went on to explain that Simon & Schuster gave the documents “on the basis of a good faith representation” that they would not be shared with Yiannopoulos. But the far-right figure pushed onward, arguing that Simon & Schuster was “engaging in gameship with these designations.”
“You are not entitled to secured documents that were explicitly provided with the understanding that they be for attorney’s eyes only,” Ostrager told Yiannopoulos.
“Would the court be willing to offer me some assistance in renegotiating?” Yiannopoulos asked.
“I’m sorry?” the judge replied.
Yiannopoulos wants the documents because he believes Simon & Schuster broke his book’s contract for both political reasons and to “save revenue lines elsewhere in the business.” He’s more than welcome to argue that point, but he cannot receive the documents by simply telling the judge to do so. In the New York Supreme Court, discovery disputes are handled with a letter to the court, followed by a response letter from the opposing party, followed by a conference to discuss the discovery dispute’s merits.
Yiannopoulos either didn’t realize this, or at the very least remembered halfway through that a summary judgment motion is underway, thus wasting the court’s time.
“Whatever,” Yiannopoulos told the court. “You know, we have that summary judgment motion pending. I understand.”
The entire proceeding transcript was later published on Feb. 7, quickly going viral after The Hill’s campaign editor Will Sommer stumbled across the transcript.
How's Milo Yiannopoulos's attempt to represent himself in a lawsuit going? Oh… pic.twitter.com/00ZdYwWl1Q
— Will Sommer (@willsommer) February 7, 2018
Milo's legal battle is not going great so far pic.twitter.com/twl875l1sO
— Will Sommer (@willsommer) February 7, 2018
Milo's court transcripts are awesome pic.twitter.com/8Niruf2w8H
— Fork Theory Adherent (@notwokieleaks) February 7, 2018
Many Twitter users pointed out that Yiannopoulos has no idea what he’s doing in court. Which means his future proceedings will be interesting, to say the least.
MILO: Your Honor, if I do not have an attorney, it puts my case in jeopardy. And if my opponent DOES have an attorney, that is DOUBLE JEOPARDY, which is illegal.
COURT: Again, no.
— Sigh Hersh (@Ugarles) February 7, 2018
The Court: Don't Milo.
Milo: But Milo!
The Court: No Milo. Bad Milo.
Milo: Okay. Bye. Thank you. pic.twitter.com/VzZTf0XUG1
— Angus Johnston (@studentactivism) February 7, 2018
Milo representing himself in court like pic.twitter.com/1AbCLK7DvN
— Alex Muresianu (@AlexMuresianu) February 8, 2018
It’s almost like Yiannopoulos’ handle on U.S. law comes from watching Legally Blonde and The Simpsons.
Milo Yiannopoulos has fired his lawyer and decided to represent himself by Live-Action Roleplaying as Lionel Hutz pic.twitter.com/sidWKVOlYr
— Apparently this profile pic invalidates my opinion (@JekoJekoUEM) February 8, 2018
Milo turning into an IRL Lionel Hutz is entertaining me far more than it should be https://t.co/pePJwoHo4P
— yung liam (@blnkclyr) February 8, 2018
Disclosure: Milo Yiannopoulos was the founder of the Kernel, a publication the Daily Dot acquired in 2014.
Ana Valens is an LGBTQ reporter and essayist for the Daily Dot. Her work has previously appeared in Bitch, the Establishment, Vice's Waypoint, Rolling Stone's Glixel, and the Toast. She lives in Brooklyn, New York.