- Former developer at software company deletes his code to protest its ties to ICE Saturday 4:21 PM
- A mysterious website is doxing Hong Kong protesters and journalists Saturday 1:44 PM
- The best ‘Skyrim’ followers and how to get them Saturday 1:26 PM
- Why Joel Osteen gets cyberbullied every time Houston floods Saturday 12:40 PM
- How to stream Jets vs. Patriots in Week 3 Saturday 12:39 PM
- 10 indie dating simulator games you should be playing Saturday 12:31 PM
- How to stream Packers vs. Broncos in Week 3 Saturday 12:14 PM
- Saudi crown prince’s former adviser suspended from Twitter Saturday 11:57 AM
- How to stream Cowboys vs. Dolphins in Week 3 Saturday 11:57 AM
- YouTuber to pay restitution after a teen fan died copying her video Saturday 10:36 AM
- Antonio Brown sent ‘intimidating’ texts to an accuser, including a pic of her children Saturday 9:38 AM
- Facebook suspended tens of thousands of apps after Cambridge Analytica scandal Saturday 8:24 AM
- How to stream Browns vs. Rams on Sunday Night Football Saturday 6:00 AM
- How to watch ‘NFL Primetime’ on ESPN+ Saturday 5:00 AM
- How to stream Liverpool vs. Chelsea Friday 6:45 PM
The Trump administration’s ban on transgender troops serving in the military has come up against an obstacle in the House of Representatives, where Democrats voted to block funding to implement the ban, PinkNews reports.
The Democrats were able to get in the block as an amendment from Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) on a $1 trillion spending bill that includes the defense funding for 2020. The amendment passed 243-183, with the support of nine Republicans and all but one Democrat.
Trump originally announced the trans military ban on Twitter in July of 2017. In spite of numerous legal challenges, as well as admonishment from veterans serving in Congress, it went into effect in April of this year. While the 10,000-plus trans folks who are already enlisted may continue to serve in the military, trans people who were preparing to enlist, such as college freshman Map Pesqueira, have had that opportunity taken away.
Republicans have continually defended the move, claiming that transgender people serving openly would undermine military readiness and threaten unit cohesion. But during the debate on the House floor on Tuesday, Rep. Anthony Brown (D-Md.), a Black man and an Army veteran, hit back on these claims.
“The president and his administration wrongfully argue that it’s about military readiness and unit cohesion, but these arguments are the same ones that were made to keep the military racially segregated,” Brown said, essentially calling out the Republicans for repeating history.
“My service in an integrated armed forces did not harm readiness,” said Brown. “Every service chief testified that transgender service would not disrupt unit cohesion or readiness.”
Although the amendment in the House may present a small stumbling block to the Trump administration, it is unlikely that such an amendment will be passed in the Republican-controlled Senate.
- Trump refuses to apologize for Central Park Five death penalty ads
- Trump says mass deportations to start next week
- YouTuber renames small town ‘Gay Hell’ to defy Trump Pride policy
Got five minutes? We’d love to hear from you. Help shape our journalism and be entered to win an Amazon gift card by filling out our 2019 reader survey.
Alex Dalbey is a writer and zinester currently living in Saint Paul, Minnesota. They have written for The Daily Dot, Kill Screen, The Lingerie Addict, and Bullet Points.