- College quarterback blasted by ex-girlfriend in savage AF breakup TikTok 2 Years Ago
- Hallmark pulls ad featuring lesbian couple after conservative protest Today 11:27 AM
- Actress’ tweet calling out fellow passenger for not moving seats backfires Today 10:43 AM
- The 10 most influential hashtags of the decade Today 6:30 AM
- A lonely grandma sought family to spend Christmas with on Craigslist Saturday 5:45 PM
- Airbnb bans white supremacists tied to Iron March forum Saturday 5:07 PM
- Did a Twitter user really get tricked into naming baby ‘Jack Ingof’? Saturday 4:46 PM
- State of emergency declared in New Orleans following ‘cyberattack’ Saturday 4:12 PM
- Video shows boy getting beat up–mom says it’s because he wore MAGA hat Saturday 3:54 PM
- Billboard changing albums chart to count YouTube streams Saturday 2:43 PM
- TikTok’s 20 most popular songs of 2019 Saturday 2:14 PM
- Greek gods memes are flooding Reddit thanks to TV reboot rumors Saturday 1:47 PM
- Anti-impeachment protesters aimlessly fumble through halls of Congress Saturday 12:54 PM
- Everything we know so far about the Xbox Series X Saturday 12:17 PM
- ASMR YouTuber Life with MaK says she was branded a ‘Nazi’ by online smear campaign Saturday 10:46 AM
A federal judge in New York ruled on Tuesday that the Trump administration must continue processing renewal applications for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, despite the Justice Department’s plan to end it in March.
The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis in Brooklyn, stated that the reasoning behind Trump’s rescinding of DACA in September—that former President Barack Obama had issued it “unconstitutionally“—was flawed, and that the administration was “erroneous” to assume that of the program, NPR reported.
Garaufis said the move to end DACA, which allows nearly 700,000 young immigrants to legally work in the U.S., violated the Administrative Procedures and Immigration and Nationality acts. As a result, the judge ordered the administration to continue processing DACA renewal applications from pre-existing DACA holders.
“Defendants thus must continue processing both initial DACA applications and DACA renewal requests under the same terms and conditions that applied before September 5, 2017, subject to the limitations described below,” Garaufis wrote.
Garaufis’ is the second ruling issued by a federal judge against the Trump administration’s decision that the DACA program will end on March 5, following January’s injunction in San Francisco in which Judge William Alsup wrote that the Trump administration’s ending of DACA was “improper” and that it must maintain the program while the decision is challenged.
In response, the Justice Department filed a petition for the U.S. Supreme Court to directly review the constitutionality of the program as well as the injunction, which it has yet to do. The Supreme Court typically doesn’t grant cases that haven’t gone through a full appeals process.
A Justice Department spokesperson maintained that the administration says DACA’s implementation was an “unlawful circumvention of Congress,” and that the courts will eventually vindicate the administration’s ending of the program. Congress is still working to pass legislation to give DACA holders and other undocumented childhood arrivals a path to naturalized citizenship, ostensibly under the DREAM Act.
Samantha Grasso is a former IRL staff writer for the Daily Dot with a reporting emphasis on immigration. Her work has appeared on Los Angeles Magazine, Death And Taxes, Revelist, Texts From Last Night, Austin Monthly, and she has previously contributed to Texas Monthly.