- Influencer Destiny Marquez faces backlash for berating Forever 21 employee 12 Months Ago
- Chelsea Handler tackles system racism in ‘Hello Privilege. It’s Me, Chelsea’ Today 9:18 AM
- Gun control proposal: Trump, lawmakers considering background check-conducting app Today 9:05 AM
- How to stream Browns vs. Jets on Monday Night Football Today 7:00 AM
- What are anons? Today 6:30 AM
- How to stream Eagles vs. Falcons on Sunday Night Football Today 6:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6, episode 4 Today 5:00 AM
- How to stream WWE’s Clash of Champions 2019 Saturday 8:00 PM
- How ‘F*ck off Scotland’ became a Scottish rallying cry amid Brexit madness Saturday 6:28 PM
- A Missouri officer resigned after his Islamophobic Facebook posts surfaced Saturday 5:08 PM
- Adding ‘Triggered’ to stock photos of white men creates Netflix comedy special thumbnails Saturday 3:10 PM
- New restaurant in New York has a seriously unfortunate name: ‘Qanoon’ Saturday 1:38 PM
- These are the 10 best ‘Star Wars’ ships Saturday 12:41 PM
- Google Maps helped solve a decades-old missing persons case Saturday 12:27 PM
- Teen who plotted deadly swatting prank over Call of Duty argument gets prison time Saturday 11:58 AM
After Christine Blasey Ford recalled how Brett Kavanaugh, as a teenager, held her down on a bed at a get together, attempted to take her clothes off, and covered her mouth as she screamed, Ford’s voice shaking as she relived her trauma before the Senate Judiciary Committee and tens of thousands of people watching at home, the New York Times opinion section wanted to know one thing: Did Twitter find Ford’s testimony credible?
Yes, this was a real question that the Twitter account for the paper’s oft-criticized opinion section posed to the internet, as if the court of public opinion had not already been in session since before Ford’s identity was revealed less than two weeks ago.
The poll, which has since been deleted, asked voters to voice whether they felt Ford’s testimony was credible, giving options for “yes,” “no,” and “unsure.”
After deleting the tweet, the opinion account shared an image of the offensive poll, with the caption, “We’re sorry for this tweet. In retrospect, a Twitter poll is insensitive in light of the gravity of this hearing. We’ve deleted it.”
We're sorry for this tweet. In retrospect, a Twitter poll is insensitive in light of the gravity of this hearing. We've deleted it. pic.twitter.com/4CqRhkuCat— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) September 27, 2018
While the tweet was live for less than four hours, it only garnered a few thousand votes, with a majority of critics tweeting directly at the Times social media account to express their opinion.
Fuck this kind of shit. Don’t put people’s sexual assault and lived experience up for public debate like this. Tweets like this just continue to fuel the fire that survivors have to endure. https://t.co/ZEdPf9WEId— Amelia Gapin (@EntirelyAmelia) September 27, 2018
Crowdsourcing opinions on alleged sexual assault! Now that's the noble way to go. https://t.co/xGWffGolH3— Mehreen Kasana (@mehreenkasana) September 27, 2018
I am glad I no longer have an NYT subscription reason number eleventy hundred and one - how they are able to walk upright when contorting themselves to be fair to both sides I can't imagine: https://t.co/l8Men73oaJ— Saudha Kasim (@Saudha_K) September 27, 2018
Upcoming New York Times Opinion polls:— Ben Ghostal (@phantom_cruiser) September 27, 2018
-The Black Death killed millions, but honestly, it was pretty sweet, right?
-Adolf Hitler made some really good points, agree/disagree?
-Rich, old white guys who inherited or fraudulently obtained their wealth are just better than you, huh? https://t.co/EkkPFG9wmx
The New York Times opinion section is looking for reader engagement on this hearing. How would you like to engage with @nytopinion?— Tom Scocca (@tomscocca) September 27, 2018
[ ] Chop them up and feed them to iguanas
[ ] Strap them to a missile and fire them into a volcano pic.twitter.com/VVpA1I2aE4
And while the Times’ opinion account did apologize, few people were satisfied by the apology, because, well, the poll was shared in the first place.
Somewhere in your processes this should have been stopped. It speaks volumes also that you didn't poll for Kavanaugh's credibility. Many unforced errors on your part, you should know better. https://t.co/I1gvZxojBq— jlee (@bunnydear) September 27, 2018
Insensitive. Unscientific. Unnecessary. https://t.co/BErx7eqDED— Jill Geisler (@JillGeisler) September 27, 2018
It's maddening and offensive that anyone - much less a storied institution like the NYT - would decide that the appropriate way to comment on this is via the lens of sportification. A woman's life was ruined forever. GTFOH w/ this basura. https://t.co/g9uPzgSuC6— AJ Joven asks: "...Is that ok, Nike?!" (@aj_joven) September 27, 2018
throw this whole day in rice https://t.co/h0EK3cLp7r— Jules (@thecityofjules) September 27, 2018
Hire more women. https://t.co/V5LLDEerbc— Brooke Binkowski (@brooklynmarie) September 27, 2018
Sorry, New York Times. Perhaps the internet is done with armchair analysis about a woman’s believability when it comes to recounting her experience with sexual assault.
Samantha Grasso is a former IRL staff writer for the Daily Dot with a reporting emphasis on immigration. Her work has appeared on Los Angeles Magazine, Death And Taxes, Revelist, Texts From Last Night, Austin Monthly, and she has previously contributed to Texas Monthly.