- Report: Disney yanks YouTube ad spending following child exploitation accusations Wednesday 7:56 PM
- These people are organizing Fyre Fest live-action role-play parties Wednesday 6:35 PM
- White woman berates Mexican restaurant manager for speaking Spanish Wednesday 4:12 PM
- In Pixar short ‘Kitbull,’ a cat and pit bull become unlikely friends Wednesday 3:48 PM
- Stop exploiting the Jussie Smollett case to discredit LGBTQ hate crime victims Wednesday 3:28 PM
- The best Netflix original movies of 2019 Wednesday 3:20 PM
- Pinterest is reportedly blocking vaccination searches Wednesday 2:53 PM
- Nike’s self-lacing smart sneakers malfunction days after release Wednesday 2:50 PM
- How to quickly get the Havoc weapon in Apex Legends Wednesday 2:48 PM
- The truth behind the anti-LGBTQ emoji controversy Wednesday 1:37 PM
- Tristan Thompson disables Instagram comments after reports he cheated on Khloe Kardashian Wednesday 11:25 AM
- Introducing ‘boner culture,’ this Gamergate blogger’s latest cause Wednesday 11:16 AM
- HBO debuts trailer for controversial Michael Jackson doc ‘Leaving Neverland’ Wednesday 10:46 AM
- Christian woman refuses to do taxes for lesbian married couple Wednesday 10:43 AM
- Political campaigns will be snooping on your phones in 2020 Wednesday 10:43 AM
Misguided male film critic is mad the Bechdel Test isn’t fair to male-dominated Hollywood
Bad Take City, population: This guy.
Sometimes movies that pass the Bechdel Test aren’t necessarily feminist movies. And movies that may be arguably pro-women or pro-girl power, don’t pass the Bechdel Test at all. Many women are well aware that just because a piece of art passes the test (by featuring two women who talk to each other about something other than a man), doesn’t mean the art is necessarily “feminist.”
However, it might be to someone who is hell-bent on discrediting women’s work, and the Bechdel Test metric for so much as existing. Perhaps that same someone would have been paid Very Real money to write a Very Bad essay titled, “If You Like Art, Don’t Take the Bechdel Test,” with the term “useless political correctness” speckling the post’s body and metadata.
In too many words, film critic Kyle Smith tells National Review readers that the Bechdel Test, a term coined from a 1980s comic, has no space in film critique, as it reveals nothing about the content of a film itself. He eloquently does so by imagining a world in which we judge films by a “cowboy” test—you know, a test that validates an existence of one or more cowboys in a film.
Smith then goes on to refute the argument that the test is “a strategy for drawing attention to the general way women are sidelined in Hollywood” by telling female filmmakers that they should write the next Lord of the Rings to make their work more palpable to filmmakers, promoters, and audiences of commercially successful films: men.
“… Movies aren’t intended to be a proper demographic cross-section of America. Movies (at least Hollywood movies) are about people on the extremes of society — cops, criminals, superheroes. These extreme characters tend to be men, and men tend to be the ones who create them. Women enjoy much more prominence in the milieu of low-budget independent movies, where the stories are more focused on ordinary people with real-world problems, but those movies usually attract small audiences. It might be true that there would be more women prominently featured in movies if more women were writing and directing more movies. But it might also be true that the reason there aren’t as many women making films is that women’s movie ideas aren’t commercial enough for Hollywood studios.”
Understandably so, Smith’s opinion sparked reaction from Twitter, many critics taking issue with Smith’s already-exhausted thoughts on the Bechdel Test, and the almost Swiss cheese-like nature of the holes scattered throughout the rest of his argument.
one of the funniest takes ive ever seen:
NRO 1) compares the bechdel test to lack of cowboys
2) acts like bechdel (made in 1985) is new https://t.co/EJuZJ0ft1d
— chloe sargeant (@chlosarge) July 11, 2017
What in the actual fuck https://t.co/K58lHuGNmP
— Mary (@MaryMarionberry) July 10, 2017
I adore art.
I love how it pushes boundaries and forces you to explore new ideas.
[TWO WOMEN TALK ON SCREEN]
What fresh hell is this!? https://t.co/bhIo5P6CH9
— Colley (@JamColley) July 11, 2017
Women are our default caregivers bc men like Kyle Smith are rewarded for acting like babies. So embarrassing. https://t.co/FXqtbijksQ
— joanna schroeder (@iproposethis) July 10, 2017
— Josh Resnick (@mr_resnick) July 11, 2017
Oh man conservative cultural critics aren't even trying to make their strawmen even remotely plausible anymore. This is so bad pic.twitter.com/I9s57cytTk
— T. (@RickyRawls) July 10, 2017
The best part of this is that it's like 10 years late. The Bechdel test is generally regarded as flawed by most feminists now. https://t.co/y5nea8M8yG
— Ben Geier (@ben_geier) July 11, 2017
This has to be dumbest thing I have read in a long long time. Where do I start?! that Cowboys don't make up 50% of the population maybe? 🤔 https://t.co/P6gIM3LADz
— AlwynHamilton (@AlwynFJH) July 11, 2017
like, really though?
this sounds like "the bechdel test made me think AND I DO *NOT* LIKE THAT!" https://t.co/bGIfFF5Yju
— BASED COMRADE ☭ (@disco_socialist) July 11, 2017
Everyone knows the Bechdel test is flawed. This is just an excuse to bash women and ignore their contribution to the sci-fi genre. https://t.co/GMzyuxLij0
— Hanna Flint (@HannaFlint) July 10, 2017
— Steve Rhodes (@tigerbeat) July 10, 2017
The basis of this argument, that the Bechdel Test provides zero context of a film, is de facto incorrect. It assesses the validity of three parameters of a film (number of female characters, female characters speaking to one another, content of female character’s dialogue), and does tell us something about general representation of women in film.
Additionally, Smith’s argument has been validated by critics before. Yes, the Bechdel Test might greenlight films like American Pie 2 and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, while the Hurt Locker does not pass. Does this disapproval necessarily mean that the latter film is objectively bad, or even worse than the former? Absolutely not. Even Alison Bechdel, the comic creator of the metric’s namesake, has said if she limited herself to watching Bechdel Test-approved movies, her entertainment options would be limited.
Despite this apparent agreement, Smith’s initial “cowboy” hypothetical and further explanations make his point greatly misguided, immature, and arguably sexist. To suggest that women’s interests or ideas aren’t “extreme” enough and the reason fewer female projects are successful in the first place is completely laughable.
Yes, Smith entertains for a sentence the idea that a male-dominated industry may be a hinderance to women, but his solution is for women to change their game. He fails to acknowledge the validity of Hollywood’s systemic sexism, how historical precedent has favored work from men—depicting stories of men and sending that work to the box office because of the decisions of men.
Who the hell are the pregnant, abortion-seeking Donna in Obvious Child, the gangly, undercutting Andy Sachs in the Devil Wears Prada, and the murderous Amy Dunne in Gone Girl if not “people on the extremes of society?” Their stories follow a hero’s journey of falls and triumphs, not unlike any of Smith’s favs: “cops, criminals, superheroes.” To discount a female character’s ability to fit these truths would be to discount women, literally half the population, as a whole.
Smith’s urgency to discount the Bechdel Test might be supported by self-proclaimed feminists in film, but his sexism-rooted reasoning is an example of why we need benchmarks like the test to check Hollywood’s male-dominated culture in the first place.
Samantha Grasso is a former IRL staff writer for the Daily Dot with a reporting emphasis on immigration. Her work has appeared on Los Angeles Magazine, Death And Taxes, Revelist, Texts From Last Night, Austin Monthly, and she has previously contributed to Texas Monthly.