- Reddit AITA: Man verbally abused partner through cat impersonations Monday 7:18 PM
- Facebook finally lets you kill distracting navigation bar notifications Monday 6:14 PM
- Artist says Thinx underwear campaign ripped off their memes (updated) Monday 5:48 PM
- Google reportedly gathering millions of Americans’ personal health records Monday 5:00 PM
- Trina goes off on Walmart shopper who allegedly called her the ‘N-word’ Monday 4:14 PM
- Bored of Helvetica? iOS users finally have some new font options Monday 4:00 PM
- Amid panic, YouTube says new terms of service won’t impact creators Monday 3:56 PM
- Opposing sides fight to control online narrative over Bolivian ‘coup’ Monday 3:50 PM
- How to sign up for the Disney+ bundle Monday 3:35 PM
- Instagram covers video costs for celebs who don’t get political Monday 3:30 PM
- T.I.’s daughter apparently unfollowed her dad on Instagram after hymen comment Monday 3:26 PM
- Meet ByteDance, the Chinese tech company behind TikTok Monday 3:09 PM
- Everything you need to know about investing app Robinhood Monday 2:44 PM
- How to stream 49ers vs. Seahawks on Monday Night Football Monday 1:43 PM
- Cops cuff Black man for eating sandwich on subway platform Monday 1:29 PM
Across the internet, a war is waging: Free speech versus the spread of false information and conspiracy theories. Social media companies are buckling under the pressure as the public condemns them for allowing vitriolic conspiracy peddlers to remain on their sites. One company, however, is steadfast in its defense of free speech, which includes Sandy Hook conspiracy theories: WordPress.
As the New York Times reports, Leonard Pozner spends hours each day finding and attempting to scrub the internet of hurtful Sandy Hook conspiracy theories. The theories he’s trying to quell are ones that say the death of his 6-year old son, Noah, was a hoax. In particular, he flags content that uses his son’s image in negative ways, ones that say Sandy Hook was a hoax or call the child out as a crisis actor.
It’s a heart-wrenching situation, and he’s had some success in flagging content shared to Facebook, Google, and Amazon. Blog posts shared to WordPress, however, are a different story.
“Posting conspiracy theories or untrue content is not banned from WordPress.com, and unfortunately this is one of those situations,” Automattic told the New York Times in a statement. “It is a truly awful situation, and we are sympathetic to the Pozner family.”
Pozner, in some cases, has tried getting content removed after filing copyright claims on his son’s photos. However, even this won’t work for Automattic, which has deemed the imagery to be “fair use.” (A stance one Stanford lecturer considered “outside the norm,” as fair use determinations can be incredibly complex.) The company has these policies in place to protect journalism, but in this case, it also seems to be protecting the conspiracy theories of the far-right.
Automattic’s CEO has said in a Recode interview that the company avoids hate speech, and egregiously fake, harmful things on its platform.
Striking the right balance between allowing people to share what they want to share, protecting journalists from outlandish copyright claims, and ensuring dangerous content doesn’t proliferate is proving one of the toughest challenges of technology companies in 2018.
H/T the New York Times
Christina Bonnington is a tech reporter who specializes in consumer gadgets, apps, and the trends shaping the technology industry. Her work has also appeared in Gizmodo, Wired, Refinery29, Slate, Bicycling, and Outside Magazine. She is based in the San Francisco Bay Area and has a background in electrical engineering.