- Video shows corpses of coronavirus victims lying in China hospital 5 Years Ago
- Kid meets Slipknot after drumming video goes viral Today 2:30 PM
- Channing Tatum responds to troll who tried to compare Jenna Dewan and Jessie J’s looks Today 1:46 PM
- Grindr pulls an ‘I don’t know her’ after Eminem suggests he uses the app Today 12:48 PM
- Here are the top 10 most popular Instagram models in 2020 Today 12:21 PM
- ‘The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina’ takes its characters on a fantasy adventure to Hell in season 3 Today 11:37 AM
- Woman no longer in sorority, school after racist MLK post Today 10:45 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Miss Americana’ starts to deconstruct the myth of Taylor Swift Today 10:32 AM
- Teens charged with attempted arson after participating in TikTok ‘outlet challenge’ Today 8:56 AM
- ‘American Dirt’ is a metaphor for a white country built on the back of immigrants Today 6:00 AM
- This woman told two students to ‘speak English’ and people are not having it Friday 9:53 PM
- Iconic 1968 drag documentary ‘The Queen’ finally released on Netflix Friday 9:29 PM
- This TikTok account for Chancellor Palpatine is hilarious Friday 8:43 PM
- Did the Space Force logo rip off Star Trek? Friday 6:24 PM
- Disabled people with service dogs say Uber, Lyft drivers are denying them rides Friday 3:25 PM
6 people gave up their firstborn children for free public Wi-Fi
Keep your kids. Read the terms and conditions.
If this doesn’t teach us to read the terms and conditions before we agree to services, nothing will.
Six people in London agreed to a “Herod Clause”—that is, to give up their firstborn child in return for the use of a Wi-Fi hotspot—because they didn’t bother to read the terms and conditions they quickly agreed to.
In an experiment conducted by security firm F-Secure in June, with the support of Europol, Wi-Fi hotspots were set up in some of the busiest areas in London for a security test.
F-Secure added a kicker to one of the hotspots—people could use the free Wi-Fi if they agreed to “render up their eldest child for the duration of eternity.” Few people read it.
Of course, no one had to surrender their progeny. “Our legal advisor Mark Deem points out that—while terms and conditions are legally binding—it is contrary to public policy to sell children in return for free services, so the clause would not be enforceable in a court of law,” said F-Secure.
F-Secure conducted the experiment to show the dangers of using unsecured public Wi-Fi hotspots, but inadvertently pointed out that no one reads terms and conditions. You don’t have to read the entire document, but at least check and see if you can keep your kids. That is the least you can do.
Micah Singleton is a former technology and culture reporter of the Daily Dot and a former staff writer at Gizmodo. His work has also appeared in Time, Yahoo, the Verge, Mashable, ReadWrite, and NBC. Singleton was named a "rising star" by the Huffington Post in 2013.