- Black man films ‘Crosswalk Cathy’ yelling racist slurs at him Tuesday 6:47 PM
- Guerrilla artists turn John Oliver billboard ad into right-wing meme Tuesday 4:20 PM
- Netflix lines up unnecessarily good cast for ‘Green Eggs and Ham’ Tuesday 3:48 PM
- Netflix drops trailer for Mötley Crüe biopic ‘The Dirt’—and the cast is wild Tuesday 3:41 PM
- QAnon’s repetitive posts are alienating even his most ardent supporters Tuesday 3:36 PM
- Noah Cyrus cries on Instagram after Lil Xan’s baby announcement Tuesday 2:26 PM
- The ‘Well yes, but actually no’ meme is here to help you explain things Tuesday 12:07 PM
- Judge orders Roger Stone to appear in court after his Instagram post Tuesday 11:24 AM
- I worked with the migrant caravan—and Trump is the cause of his national emergency Tuesday 11:09 AM
- How to watch Liverpool vs. Bayern Munich online for free Tuesday 11:08 AM
- ‘Patriot Act’ volume 2 proves Hasan Minhaj is the next big star of the news-comedy genre Tuesday 11:01 AM
- ‘Friends From College’ canceled after 2 seasons at Netflix Tuesday 10:53 AM
- Allow your wallet to be your spirit guide during this rad anime sale Tuesday 10:43 AM
- Man stages fake DUI trial to propose to girlfriend, and people are asking why Tuesday 10:40 AM
- Bernie Sanders’ website full of 404s on launch day Tuesday 10:23 AM
A pair of former Wendy’s employees want to know what the company does with worker fingerprints.
Wendy’s is facing a class-action lawsuit in Illinois for the way it has collected and handled worker fingerprints.
A pair of former Wendy’s employees, Martinique Owens and Amelia Garcia, claim that the fast-food chain is in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. Wendy’s uses worker fingerprints in its biometric clocks, which allow workers to quickly clock into work when they arrive, to log-into its point-of-sale system, and to clock out at the end of their shift.
Owens and Garcia’s problem isn’t that Wendy’s uses fingerprints this way, but rather that the company has not shared with employees how it stores or uses that data. BIPA stipulates that employees should be notified in writing regarding the reason and length of time their fingerprints will be collected and stored. It also requires that the company get employee permission before using their fingerprints. The plaintiffs said that Wendy’s doesn’t share how it handles former worker fingerprints after they’ve left the company. Are those fingerprint records destroyed, and if so, upon what timeline?
The plaintiffs cite both Wendy’s and Discovery NCR Corporation, the company that built the software for Wendy’s biometric clocks, point-of-sale system, and cash register systems.
In the suit, the plaintiffs are asking for equitable relief, compensation for their legal expenses, and formal clarification of whether the fast-food chain “sold, leased, traded, or otherwise profited from Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s biometric identifiers or biometric information,” according to ZDNet.
Unlike ID cards or other forms of identification, biometric identifiers like fingerprints are not just unique, but also nearly impossible to change—it’s something you’re born with. It’s why in Apple’s iPhones, for example, facial recognition and fingerprint data are stored in a secure enclave, a separate, highly secure storage area separate from other iPhone data. If fingerprint data isn’t stored or secured properly, it could leave people open to serious, irreparable privacy threats, and in this class-action suit, it appears that the plaintiffs are trying to ensure that doesn’t become the case with Wendy’s employees.
Christina Bonnington is a tech reporter who specializes in consumer gadgets, apps, and the trends shaping the technology industry. Her work has also appeared in Gizmodo, Wired, Refinery29, Slate, Bicycling, and Outside Magazine. She is based in the San Francisco Bay Area and has a background in electrical engineering.