- Iconic 1968 drag documentary ‘The Queen’ finally released on Netflix Friday 9:29 PM
- This TikTok account for Chancellor Palpatine is hilarious Friday 8:43 PM
- Did the Space Force logo rip off Star Trek? Friday 6:24 PM
- Disabled people with service dogs say Uber, Lyft drivers are denying them rides Friday 3:25 PM
- TikTok teen famous for greasy hair ends her 8-year reign Friday 2:48 PM
- Police handcuff brown man at subway station for carrying a toy gun Friday 1:20 PM
- Fake clip of Sanders quoting infamous ‘hot chip’ tweet is duping people online Friday 1:16 PM
- The Mars Volta’s Cedric Bixler-Zavala alleges Scientologists behind dog’s death Friday 12:46 PM
- Eminem responds to critics: ‘This album was not made for the squeamish’ Friday 12:42 PM
- ‘The poet, the poem’ meme takes iconic lines and turns them into art Friday 12:40 PM
- People are making dark memes about the coronavirus Friday 12:27 PM
- Trump camp’s ‘head on a pike’ impeachment threat hit with memes Friday 11:34 AM
- What is the #FreeBritney movement, and why is Cher tweeting about it? Friday 10:52 AM
- This YouTuber claims the Saudi government plotted to kidnap him on U.S. soil Friday 10:30 AM
- Report: Jack Dorsey declined to host a fundraiser for Tulsi Gabbard Friday 10:22 AM
Google is at odds with Uber’s self-driving car project in a big way. On Friday, Waymo, Google’s self-driving car division, asked a federal court in San Francisco to block Uber’s progress on its self-driving car. Waymo believes that Uber is using stolen technology on this project.
In late February, Google filed a lawsuit against Uber claiming that former employee Anthony Levandowski used stolen files to help speed up Uber’s self-driving car efforts. The suit is being filed under a relatively new law, the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Under this law, Google could temporarily stop Uber’s progress on its self-driving vehicles (as it’s doing now), permanently halt development on areas that use the stolen technology, and even allow Google to seize products created using these trade secrets. If the court rules in Waymo’s favor, Uber could also have to pay Google royalties for all future driverless taxi rides. Levandowski could also face jail time.
The situation began in December 2015, when Levandowski allegedly downloaded 9.7 gigabytes of proprietary data from Waymo before starting his self-driving truck startup, Otto. (Levandowski used “special software” to download these 14,000 files, the New York Times reports. A few days later, he attached a memory card to his computer for eight hours.) Uber acquired Otto last summer. Since then, Levandowski has headed up the ride-hailing company’s own self-driving vehicle endeavors.
After being inadvertently cc’ed on a supplier email, Waymo noticed that Uber’s lidar circuit board design was uncannily similar to its own proprietary designs. These were outlined in the files Levandowski reportedly accessed.
To deal with this, on Friday, Waymo requested a preliminary injunction against Otto and Uber. This is designed to preserve the status quo ahead of a final court ruling. The hearing for this will take place April 27.
Uber has called Waymo’s lawsuit “baseless attempt to slow down a competitor.” If the court did rule in Waymo’s favor, it could leave Uber scrambling as both well-established and newly founded automakers rush to lead the burgeoning autonomous vehicle space.
H/T the New York Times
Christina Bonnington is a tech reporter who specializes in consumer gadgets, apps, and the trends shaping the technology industry. Her work has also appeared in Gizmodo, Wired, Refinery29, Slate, Bicycling, and Outside Magazine. She is based in the San Francisco Bay Area and has a background in electrical engineering.