- Trump signed an ego tweet sheet for Tomi Lahren–and it features conspiracy theorists Wednesday 6:59 PM
- Attorneys say ICE deleted evidence pertaining to transgender asylum seeker’s death Wednesday 6:24 PM
- Everything you need to know about VSCO filter codes Wednesday 6:17 PM
- Are users prepared to pay for Gmail storage space? Wednesday 6:09 PM
- Facebook pledges $1 billion to fight housing crisis it helped create Wednesday 5:16 PM
- Lizzo officially credits ‘DNA test’ tweet writer on ‘Truth Hurts’ Wednesday 4:50 PM
- Pornhub takes down videos secretly filmed in a college women’s locker room Wednesday 4:15 PM
- Google Maps on iPhone now shows you speed traps Wednesday 3:47 PM
- Here’s why you’re seeing ‘rise and shine’ all over social media Wednesday 3:45 PM
- AOC grills Zuckerberg over false political ads on Facebook Wednesday 3:27 PM
- Fox News promotes pro-faith, anti-antifa film ‘The Reliant’ Wednesday 3:17 PM
- Cardi B to star in ‘Fast & Furious 9’ Wednesday 3:12 PM
- AOC on opening her DMs: ‘By this morning, it was trash’ Wednesday 2:26 PM
- The ending to Netflix’s ‘Eli’ has divided viewers Wednesday 2:07 PM
- Teen consumes ungodly amount of meat, becomes meme Wednesday 2:07 PM
Uber is pushing back against legislation in California that aims to reclassify the ride-hailing company’s contractors as official employees.
The proposal, known as Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), comes after a recent ruling from the state’s Supreme Court that limits the ability of companies in the gig economy to consider their workers as nothing more than independent contractors.
On Thursday, however, Tony West, Uber’s chief legal official, argued that AB5 does not apply to its drivers.
“Contrary to some of the rhetoric we’ve heard, AB5 does not automatically reclassify any rideshare drivers from independent contractors to employees,” West said during a press call. “AB5 does not provide drivers with benefits. AB5 does not give drivers the right to organize. In fact, the bill currently says nothing about rideshare drivers.”
Whether or not someone is an employee in California is determined by what is known as the “ABC test.” West argued that its drivers would not pass the test because they are not a core part of Uber’s business.
“Under that three-part test, arguably the highest bar is that a company must prove that contractors are doing work ‘outside the usual course’ of its business,” West said. “Several previous rulings have found that drivers’ work is outside the usual course of Uber’s business, which is serving as a technology platform for several different types of digital marketplaces.”
The legislation also opens up Uber to lawsuits from the state if it fails to follow AB5’s provisions.
Uber is now planning to push for a 2020 ballot initiative that would create a new job classification for ridesharing drivers, thus removing the possibility that AB5 could transform drivers into official employees.
West also asserted that Uber could increase the wellbeing of its drivers without AB5, which he claims would stifle the work flexibility that their contractors now enjoy.
“Drivers would not be able to choose when to sign on anytime they want it,” West said. “They would work in shifts like every other employee works in shifts. Drivers would not be able to choose to sign off whenever they wanted to because there would be a set time that they would have to work, they would not be able to do that.”
While almost certainly guaranteed, AB5 still must make its way to California Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk before becoming law.
- Uber and Lyft: Driver names are ‘trade secrets’
- Ex-Google and Uber engineer charged with stealing trade secrets
- Uber Eats joins the ranks of bad Pride campaigns
H/T The Verge
Mikael Thalen is a tech and security reporter based in Seattle, covering social media, data breaches, hackers, and more.