- UPS facing backlash for thanking police after employee killed in shootout Saturday 5:02 PM
- Sanders campaign fires staffer after anti-Semitic, homophobic tweets surface Saturday 3:13 PM
- Brother Nature was attacked, says everyone just watched with phones out Saturday 2:45 PM
- Ryan Reynolds’ gin company hires Peloton wife for ad Saturday 1:24 PM
- Ex-vegan YouTuber accused of fraud after following meat-only diet Saturday 1:11 PM
- The 15 best Disney+ hidden gems and deep cuts Saturday 12:23 PM
- Everyone in GoFundMe scam involving homeless veteran has now pleaded guilty Saturday 12:06 PM
- Boy invites kindergarten class to his adoption–and people are emotional Saturday 11:56 AM
- Reddit links leaked trade deal documents to Russian campaign Saturday 10:44 AM
- How to stream Alistair Overeem vs. Jairzinho Rozenstruik Saturday 8:30 AM
- Amazon sends customers condoms and soap instead of Nintendo Switch Saturday 8:28 AM
- How to live stream Jermall Charlo vs. Dennis Hogan Saturday 8:00 AM
- Apple TV’s ‘Truth Be Told’ is a criminally dull drama Saturday 6:00 AM
- Thousands of Uber users have reported sexual assaults, company says Friday 5:40 PM
- ‘Astronomy Club’ reformats the sketch show Friday 4:58 PM
Facebook-owned fitness app, Moves, flip flops on user data privacy
As always, Facebook gets all the data.
A few weeks ago, Facebook purchased fitness app Moves, a small-but-adored activity tracking startup created by a Finnish company called ProtoGeo. With the purchase, Moves went from a beloved underdog to a fitness tech app capable of rivaling the likes of FitBit and Runkeeper. It also gave a potential opening for Facebook to enter into the burgeoning fitness tech market.
Moves took immediate steps to assure users the purchase did not mean they had to worry about Facebook accessing all of their personal data. Moves emphasized, in a blog post and a tweet, that the company had no plans to “commingle data with Facebook.”
.@imdiane We have no plans to commingle data with Facebook. Moves will remain independent.
— Moves (@movesapp) April 24, 2014
— Ole Begemann (@olebegemann) May 5, 2014
This news should surprise no one—it’s only logical for a parent company to want to use data a company it purchased has on offer. Indeed, Moves’ data could be enormously helpful to Facebook, since it provides detailed information about user activity, specifically offline body activity that Facebook has not had access to in the past.
This decision makes Moves and Facebook look shady—like they’re trying to sweep the policy change under the rug.
Not only could this course of action alienate Moves users, it casts Facebook’s claims that it leaves other acquisitions alone in a less credulous light. And finally, it proves the people who expressed skepticism that the companies would keep their data separate right, further eroding user trust.
Moves’ policy change makes sense for its parent company. But the decision to carry it out in this way makes sense for no one.
Updated 2:12 EST: A Facebook spokesperson clarified that they do not believe “commingle” and “share” to be synonymous. Here’s the explanation: “Commingling, or merging, data would allow us to identify Moves users who are also Facebook users – we have no plans to do that. In other words, Facebook is not adding Moves user data to a Facebook user’s Facebook account. But, Facebook will be providing support and services to the Moves app and to be able to do this, we have to have access to the data that Moves already collects from its users – which is ‘sharing’ data,” a Facebook spokesperson told Daily Dot. “In order to support the provision and operation of the Moves app, Facebook will need to have access to the Moves data. Such support for Moves may include performing technical maintenance and developments of the service that improve your experience with the app.”
This makes it even more odd that they wouldn’t have established this from the beginning.
H/T Buzzfeed | Illustration by Jason Reed
Kate Knibbs is a notable tech reporter and pop culture essayist. A former staff writer for the Daily Dot, her work has appeared in Gizmodo, the Ringer, AV Club, Digital Trends, Popular Mechanics, and Time.