- How to stream Barcelona vs. Eibar Friday 6:00 PM
- How to stream ‘Bigfoot’ Silva vs. Gabriel Gonzaga in BKFC Friday 6:00 PM
- Demi Lovato’s nude photos allegedly leaked on Snapchat Friday 3:07 PM
- NBA TV is the new streaming service for basketball fanatics Friday 3:02 PM
- California residents will get cell phone alerts seconds before earthquakes Friday 2:29 PM
- How to stream Real Madrid vs. RCD Mallorca Friday 2:00 PM
- Trump accused of ‘using the language of ethnic cleansing’ regarding Kurds Friday 1:42 PM
- Hillary Clinton also thinks Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian bot Friday 1:13 PM
- TikTok girls dancing to voicemails from sh*tty exes is a vibe Friday 12:34 PM
- Netflix reports strong growth—but it faces 3 major hurdles in Q4 Friday 12:33 PM
- Telegram is hosting videos of extrajudicial killings in Syria Friday 12:32 PM
- ‘El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie’ tops 8 million viewers in first week Friday 11:31 AM
- ‘Uncut Gems’ brings a high-stakes gambling risk to life Friday 11:29 AM
- Mark Zuckerberg gives a revisionist history about why he started Facebook in big speech Friday 10:52 AM
- Would Hitler be allowed to tweet? Friday 10:21 AM
A leading artificial-intelligence group is calling for a ban on the development of offensive autonomous weapons, and in a sign of how many people are worried about this threat, the open letter has attracted hundreds of signatures from the brightest minds in artificial intelligence and robotics.
Among the signatories on the letter from the Future of Life Institute are renowned physicist Stephen Hawking, Tesla founder Elon Musk, and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak. The letter is set to be presented at the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence in Buenos Aires on Tuesday.
The letter, which also attracted signatures from Noam Chomsky and a host of other high-profile thinkers and researchers, urges world powers to be cautious in using artificial intelligence to create weapons.
The letter draws a bright line between autonomous weapons that require human guidance and weapons that can operate completely on their own.
Cruise missiles and remotely piloted drones are acceptable, the signatories said, because humans still make the targeting decisions. However, “armed quadcopters that can search for and eliminate people meeting certain pre-defined criteria” would be a step too far, as that would remove humans from the decision-making chain.
According to the letter, automatic targeting systems are expected to be feasible within the next few years. The race to develop the technology will lead to autonomous weapons becoming the “Kalashnikovs of tomorrow”—cheap, easy to acquire, and easy to mass produce.
The letter’s signatories urged immediate action to ban these systems in order to avoid a “military AI arms race.”
Autonomous weapons development, the letter argues, would result in technology that is “ideal for tasks such as assassinations, destabilizing nations, subduing populations and selectively killing a particular ethnic group.”
Researchers and scientists involved in the development of artificial intelligence also made their case by comparing autonomous weapons to nuclear ones.
“Just as most chemists and biologists have no interest in building chemical or biological weapons,” they said, “most AI researchers have no interest in building AI weapons—and do not want others to tarnish their field by doing so, potentially creating a major public backlash against AI that curtails its future societal benefits.”
Hawking and Musk have been particularly vocal in their opposition to weaponized AI in the past. Hawking warned that the development of AI could lead to the end of humanity, and Musk donated $10 million to research on AI safety. He has also compared AI advancements to “summoning the demon.”
AJ Dellinger is a seasoned technology writer whose work has appeared in Digital Trends, International Business Times, and Newsweek. In 2018, he joined Gizmodo as the nights and weekend editor.