- How to watch Crawford vs. Khan online 2 Years Ago
- Beyoncé has 2 more projects coming to Netflix after ‘Homecoming’ 2 Years Ago
- How to watch Danny Garcia vs. Adrian Granados for free Today 9:00 AM
- The ‘Feeling Cute Challenge’ turns ugly after correctional officers abuse it Today 7:30 AM
- How to watch ‘How High 2’ for free Today 7:00 AM
- Swipe This! My ex-BFF keeps sliding into my DMs, but I don’t want to be friends Today 6:30 AM
- Watch ‘I Am Somebody’s Child: The Regina Louise Story’ for free Today 6:00 AM
- How to watch Barcelona vs. Real Sociedad for free Today 6:00 AM
- How to stream UFC Fight Night 149 for free Today 5:30 AM
- PDF Association dunks on Mueller report PDF Friday 7:33 PM
- Robert Downey Jr. says ‘Endgame’ finale is ‘best 8 minutes’ of any MCU film Friday 4:42 PM
- Elizabeth Warren calls on Congress to impeach Trump Friday 3:43 PM
- BlackBerry Messenger is still a thing—but not for much longer Friday 2:56 PM
- Matt Gaetz hires speechwriter fired by White House for attending white nationalist event Friday 1:33 PM
- Here’s why Elon Musk is a sheep on Twitter Friday 12:14 PM
Photo via Zack Frank/Shutterstock (Licensed)
They’re looking into something a bit more cost effective.
An unnamed ally of the United States used a $3 million Patriot missile to shoot down a quadcopter.
General David Perkins said a “a very close ally” of the United States used the anti-basaltic missile system against a lone drone. The general said the nation was dealing with an adversary and not doing testing, which suggests that this is the actual protocol for getting rid of a consumer UAV.
“They shot it down with a Patriot missile,” the general said, in comments shared by the U.S. Army on YouTube. “Now that worked. They got it, OK, and we love Patriot missiles. The problem is, on the kinetic exchange ratio they won. That quadcopter they bought on Amazon for 200 bucks didn’t stand a chance against the Patriot.”
Patriot projectiles are designed to travel five times the speed of sound under radar guidance to strike their enemy. It is the second most expensive missile in the world, after the $65 million Trident projectile.
Perkins did admit that using a Patriot missile wasn’t exactly a cost effective approach, “I’m not sure that is a good economic exchange ratio. If I’m the enemy I’m thinking, ‘hey I’m just going to go on eBay and buy all the quadcopters I can and expend all the Patriot missiles out there.’”
The general says they are looking at alternative ways of dealing with the issue, including using electronic or cyber-warfare. Those probably won’t come cheap, but they sound a lot more logical than throwing away $3 million every time someone needs to take out a drone.
H/T the Independent
Phillip Tracy is a former technology staff writer at the Daily Dot. He's an expert on smartphones, social media trends, and gadgets. He previously reported on IoT and telecom for RCR Wireless News and contributed to NewBay Media magazine. He now writes for Laptop magazine.