- Three ways to secure your Nest cameras 2 Years Ago
- This Pokémon generator site is creating hilarious monsters 2 Years Ago
- MrBeast impersonator tricks kid into destroying his XBox Today 12:50 PM
- This mom has the perfect nickname for her nonbinary kid Today 12:25 PM
- Netflix tests pop-out player that will allow viewers to multitask Today 11:44 AM
- Man allowed to sue media publishers over readers’ Facebook comments Today 11:42 AM
- Republicans slammed for joke about ‘heavily armed militia’ at Oregon statehouse Today 11:30 AM
- New bill wants tech companies to tell you how much your data is worth Today 10:53 AM
- AOC has the best response to Steve King’s ‘concentration camp’ criticism Today 10:19 AM
- Did Jake Paul and Tana Mongeau just get engaged? Today 9:26 AM
- Leaked documents reveal all the ‘red flags’ about Trump officials Today 9:02 AM
- Elon Musk, who wants to colonize space, thought the moon was Mars Today 8:56 AM
- How to watch ‘Legion’ for free Today 8:46 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Bolívar’ reduces hero’s tale to irredeemable melodrama Today 8:18 AM
- How to watch the U.S. vs. Spain at the World Cup for free Today 7:55 AM
Photo via Zack Frank/Shutterstock (Licensed)
They’re looking into something a bit more cost effective.
An unnamed ally of the United States used a $3 million Patriot missile to shoot down a quadcopter.
General David Perkins said a “a very close ally” of the United States used the anti-basaltic missile system against a lone drone. The general said the nation was dealing with an adversary and not doing testing, which suggests that this is the actual protocol for getting rid of a consumer UAV.
“They shot it down with a Patriot missile,” the general said, in comments shared by the U.S. Army on YouTube. “Now that worked. They got it, OK, and we love Patriot missiles. The problem is, on the kinetic exchange ratio they won. That quadcopter they bought on Amazon for 200 bucks didn’t stand a chance against the Patriot.”
Patriot projectiles are designed to travel five times the speed of sound under radar guidance to strike their enemy. It is the second most expensive missile in the world, after the $65 million Trident projectile.
Perkins did admit that using a Patriot missile wasn’t exactly a cost effective approach, “I’m not sure that is a good economic exchange ratio. If I’m the enemy I’m thinking, ‘hey I’m just going to go on eBay and buy all the quadcopters I can and expend all the Patriot missiles out there.’”
The general says they are looking at alternative ways of dealing with the issue, including using electronic or cyber-warfare. Those probably won’t come cheap, but they sound a lot more logical than throwing away $3 million every time someone needs to take out a drone.
H/T the Independent
Phillip Tracy is a former technology staff writer at the Daily Dot. He's an expert on smartphones, social media trends, and gadgets. He previously reported on IoT and telecom for RCR Wireless News and contributed to NewBay Media magazine. He now writes for Laptop magazine.