- Brad Pitt clutching Jennifer Aniston’s hand sparks all the rumors 6 Years Ago
- The man who sold shares of himself on the internet Today 7:00 AM
- The rise of the conservative ‘mancast’ in a world of changing masculinity Today 6:00 AM
- Amazon’s ‘Troop Zero’ gives the underdog movie a stylized re-do Today 4:20 AM
- No, the first words of Trump’s tweets don’t match up to lyrics of ‘Break My Stride’ Sunday 10:28 PM
- White woman demanding strangers ‘repent’ for Christ sparks conversation on mental illness and racism Sunday 9:27 PM
- Amtrak employee asked a NAACP lawyer to move from her train seat Sunday 7:54 PM
- Billie Eilish fans riot after being referred to as ‘Avocados’ Sunday 4:37 PM
- Beyhive coming for Sainsbury’s supermarket over Ivy Park shade Sunday 3:17 PM
- Antique store blasted for selling ‘white only’ signs Sunday 1:45 PM
- DaBaby explains altercation with hotel employee after video goes viral Sunday 12:32 PM
- Kanye faces backlash for headlining Christian event with anti-LGBTQ leaders Sunday 10:31 AM
- Why is Yennefer of Vengerberg so different in Netflix’s ‘The Witcher’? Sunday 10:00 AM
- Actress slammed for ‘acid attack-face’ TikTok challenge Sunday 9:46 AM
- ‘Weathering With You’ blends fantasy and realism in a magical love story Saturday 6:18 PM
Dread Pirate Roberts deemed digital ‘Godfather’ in Silk Road pretrial
The judge likened Dread Pirate Roberts to a digital “Godfather,” determining the territory.
Judge Katherine B. Forrest denied Ulbricht’s motion to dismiss the indictment against him in a 51-page decision released Wednesday. Ulbricht, 30, is facing potential life in prison for narcotics and computer hacking conspiracy charges, money laundering, and being the kingpin of a continuing criminal enterprise.
Ulbricht’s defense had two main arguments in their motion to dismiss the indictment. The first was that even if Ulbricht did run the online drug empire Silk Road using the name “Dread Pirate Roberts” as alleged, he still would not have sold any drugs. Joshua Dratel, Ulbricht’s lawyer, said that his client would have merely been a “digital landlord,” who is not responsible for the actions of his tenants.
Forrest shot down with the digital landlord argument. She wrote that Dread Pirate Roberts acted more like a digital “Godfather” responsible for “determining the territory, the actions which may be undertaken, and the commissions he will retain; disciplining others to stay in line; and generally casting himself as a leader – and not a service provider.”
Forrest also didn’t buy the argument that Bitcoin can’t be used to launder money, the second main point from Ulbricht’s defense. To Forrest, since Bitcoin is a “medium of exchange,” it should be regulated similar to other currencies.
“The money laundering statute is broad enough to encompass use of Bitcoins in financial transactions,” Forrest wrote. “Any other reading would—in light of Bitcoins’ sole raison d’etre—be nonsensical.”
Ulbricht’s defense also presented a significant number of smaller arguments, to the point that Forrest referred to them as “kitchen sink arguments.”
Dratel was likely probing for legal softspots because of the unprecedented nature of the case. There has never been an illicit ecommerce site nearly as successful as Silk Road.
Ulbricht is accused of reaping tens of millions of dollars in commissions. The U.S. government says it is in possession of 144,000 bitcoins seized from the harddrive of Ulbricht’s laptop. Those bitcoins were worth around $18 million at the time the FBI shut down Silk Road last October, and it’s worth about $90 million at today’s exchange rates.
Forrest agreed that the case is unprecedented, referring to it as “a case of first impression,” but she was unequivocal in her belief that the “alleged conduct constitutes cognizable crimes.”
The case is scheduled to go to trial on Nov. 3. Judge Forrest’s full 51-page decision is copied below.
Photo by Jeffrey Beall/Flickr and Silk Road | Remixed by Fran Berkman (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Fran Berkman is a technology reporter whose work for the Daily Dot focused on cryptocurrencies and internet freedom. In April 2017, he joined BuzzFeed as the deputy director of news curation.