- Our 5 favorite AirPod charging cases at every price point 6 Years Ago
- Amazon Prime almost completely swept the Emmys’ comedy section 6 Years Ago
- People are outraged that a 6-year-old was arrested for a temper tantrum 6 Years Ago
- A tropical storm named Karen is sparking jokes about calling the manager 6 Years Ago
- Patriotic Facebook page reaching millions of Americans is run by Ukrainians Today 12:11 PM
- Review: ‘Color Out of Space’ and the cosmic horror of an uninvited guest Today 11:58 AM
- Snap’s ‘Project Voldemort’ dossier details Facebook’s bullying tactics Today 11:42 AM
- Conservatives compare teen activist Greta Thunberg to Nazi poster girl Today 11:17 AM
- Trump’s immigration czar is upset climate activists are calling out capitalism Today 10:47 AM
- A bunch of popular YouTube channels were the victims of a nasty hack Today 10:10 AM
- Austin City Limits, Bonnaroo, other festivals pledge to not use facial recognition Today 9:47 AM
- How to watch ‘The Voice’ season 17 Today 9:44 AM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ ties its own Emmys record for a single season Today 8:57 AM
- Michelle Williams used her Emmy speech to call out pay disparities in Hollywood Today 8:39 AM
- Outraged vapers could sink Trump in 2020 Today 8:31 AM
Wikipedia hits sockpuppet PR firm with cease-and-desist notice
Wiki-PR is not affiliated with Wikipedia, and Wikipedia wants to make that clear.
Wikipedia has finally had enough with a public relations company it accuses of hiring fake editors to alter articles on the world’s largest encyclopedia in its clients’ favor.
So Wikimedia, Wikipedia’s parent company, has sent a public cease and desist letter to Wiki-PR, threatening to “take any necessary legal action.”
Despite its name, Wiki-PR has no relation to Wikimedia. That in fact belies the site’s biggest complaint: That the firm blurs the line between those legions of Wikipedia editors who spend hours trying to make the site objective and truthful, and a public relations firm that wants to make a buck by altering articles to make its clients look better.
Clients who hire Wiki-PR have previously told the Daily Dot that they were unsatisfied with their service. Their company pages would go down after a Wikipedia editor discovered it and deleted it for not being newsworthy, they said, and though Wiki-PR would promise to have it right back up, that often wasn’t the case.
Soon after news broke of Wiki-PR’s practices—often referred to as “sockpuppetry”— Wikimedia released a statement condemning the firm’s actions. On October 25, it formally banned “anyone who derives financial benefit from editing the English Wikipedia on behalf of Wiki-PR.com or its founders.”
But it appears that message didn’t take. Wikimedia took another stepTuesday, having its chief lawyer send a cease and desist letter and publishing that letter on its site. It states, in part:
Further, it adds, Wiki-PR hasn’t responded to two previous letters charging that it infringes on Wikipedia’s trademark.
Wikimedia gave Wiki-PR until Friday to acknowledge the cease and desist, with the clear implication it plans to press charges if the site doesn’t comply.
Illustration by Jason Reed
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.