- Ancestry.com ad tries to sell slavery as romance—not rape 5 Years Ago
- The 9 best Satanic movies on Shudder 5 Years Ago
- Twitch streamer banned after accidentally revealing racist chats 5 Years Ago
- This video captures 15 years of meme trends in 10 minutes Today 8:57 AM
- Trump calls parts of Mueller Report ‘total bullshit’ in unfinished tweetstorm Today 8:24 AM
- Amid ‘Avengers’ hype, ‘Spider-Man: Far From Home’ bumps up release date Today 7:57 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Someone Great’ is a coming-of-age rom-com for twenty-somethings Today 7:03 AM
- The best new movies and TV shows to stream this weekend Today 7:00 AM
- ‘Ramy’ explores the intersection of Muslim and millennial identities Today 6:30 AM
- The top 10 Sekiro bosses, ranked Today 6:00 AM
- How to install PlayStation Vue on Kodi to stream live TV Today 5:30 AM
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez supports resolution that could lead to Trump’s impeachment Thursday 9:46 PM
- Ricardo Milos dancing memes are the new Rickroll Thursday 9:09 PM
- Laura Loomer sues Twitter, Muslim lobbying group over account ban Thursday 8:15 PM
- Far-right troll Ian Miles Cheong gets flamed for mocking a ‘Star Wars’ fan Thursday 6:17 PM
A novel Internet time machine.
Wikipedia may not be perfect—far from it—but to begin to appreciate how great it is, you need to see the encyclopedia’s first drafts.
John Overholt, a Harvard librarian and curator of early modern books, just launched a new blog called First Drafts of History that spotlights the very first drafts of Wikipedia articles.
It’s a blog about history, ambition, and often strange first amateur attempts to jot down history. Here’s an article about the iPhone (or IPhone), dated June 2005, two years before its release (click to expand).
Compare that to the current article and you quickly appreciate the work that editors and contributors put in.
“As someone who’s interested in history, the origins of things are always fascinating to me, and I think very informative,” Overholt told the Daily Dot.
This tiny 2004 first draft about Barack Obama and long 2001 first draft on Star Trek may reveal a little about contributors’ interests at the time.
Click to expand:
“Wikipedia is such an incredibly ambitious undertaking, and I thought, ‘Where do you start with a project of that scale?’” Overholt wrote in a message to the Daily Dot. “It’s unusual that history is so meticulously documented (although I gather some of the earliest is now lost). It’s also interesting to see the editorial voice and organizational structures now common on Wikipedia evolve over time.”
It’s true, and that makes First Drafts of History a brilliant little time machine worth reading. Here’s hoping Overholt keeps on exploring the Internet gone by.
H/T Kottke | Logo via Wikipedia
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.