- Philadelphia to fire 13 officers for racist, violent Facebook posts Saturday 6:12 PM
- Nick Offerman is so down to play every single role in ‘Cats’ Saturday 4:27 PM
- Woman documents how airport staff broke her wheelchair Saturday 3:04 PM
- Funeral home allegedly posted photos of woman’s dead body on social media Saturday 1:56 PM
- Alinity Divine is being investigated after throwing her cat during stream (updated) Saturday 12:04 PM
- ‘Comedians In Cars Getting Coffee’ returns with Seinfeld making a racist joke about China Saturday 10:26 AM
- YouTubers Eugenia Cooney and Shane Dawson make a joint comeback Saturday 9:06 AM
- The crushing effects of Trump’s abortion ‘gag rule’ on healthcare Saturday 8:00 AM
- How to live stream Pacquiao vs. Thurman Saturday 6:20 AM
- Review: Hulu with Live TV ensures you always have something to watch Saturday 6:00 AM
- How to live stream UFC on ESPN 4: Rafael dos Anjos vs. Leon Edwards Saturday 5:49 AM
- 2020 Democrats refuse to answer our questions about ‘Cats’ Friday 4:14 PM
- Belle Delphine’s Instagram account removed after mass reporting campaign Friday 4:08 PM
- Mariah Carey refuses old-age FaceApp challenge Friday 3:19 PM
- Journalists horrified by consolidation of Gatehouse, Gannett Friday 3:12 PM
World’s most notorious copyright troll will have to repay its victims
Prenda Law loses another case.
The world’s most notorious “copyright troll” will finally have to pay back some of its victims.
Copyright trolls are universally reviled by anyone who uses the term, which refers to the practice of owning or legally representing a copyrighted work with the express purpose of making money by suing people over it—regardless of whether the defendant actually pirated anything. It’s particularly effective when the lawsuit alleges that someone pirated porn, because that extra hint of shame can keep victims from fighting a case in court.
None stand accused of more malfeasance than Prenda Law, a firm that tried to sue blogs that criticize it to learn the identities of their visitors, threatened to tell alleged infringers’ neighbors they stood accused of pirating porn, and allegedly uploaded that porn to the Pirate Bay itself and created sham companies to hide its tracks.
But Prenda, which has recently been nailed by a succession of judges, took another blow Wednesday. Magistrate Franklin L. Noel found that through an affiliate company named AF Holdings—a shell company, according to critics familiar with the firm—Prenda shook down four people for amounts ranging from $3,500 to $6,000. It now has to repay that money, plus legal fees.
Noting that a previous judge found AF Holdings to “have no assets other than several copyrights to pornographic movies,” Noel ordered Prenda to pay up to the four who settled their lawsuits, as well as to a fifth who successfully defended against them in court:
The Court has been the victim of a fraud perpetrated by AF Holdings, LLC. The Court concludes that the appropriate remedy for this fraud is to require AF Holdings to return all of the settlement money it received from all of the Defendants in these cases, and to pay all costs and fees (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by the Defendants. After all settlement payments are returned and other fees are paid, all five cases should be dismissed on the merits, with prejudice.
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.