- Is Jacob Wohl evading his Twitter ban with Jack Burkman’s account? Today 2:06 PM
- Biden’s most perplexing debate answers, explained Today 2:03 PM
- How to stream Colts vs. Texans on Thursday Night Football Today 12:52 PM
- Netflix drops ‘A Christmas Prince: The Royal Baby’ trailer Today 12:43 PM
- Uber says it will audio-record rides to address safety concerns Today 12:41 PM
- ‘Avengers: Endgame’ writers go in-depth on how they decided which superheroes lived and died Today 12:22 PM
- How to watch Duke vs. Cal in the 2K Empire classic Today 12:09 PM
- Trump’s impeachment notes get riffed into punk songs Today 12:01 PM
- Pete Buttigieg can’t do the Pete Buttigieg dance Today 11:55 AM
- How a woman’s cold ‘rejection form’ text message became an ’emotional labor’ meme Today 11:52 AM
- How to watch Texas vs. Georgetown in the 2K Empire classic Today 11:40 AM
- Apple cancels premiere of original film ‘The Banker’ amid sexual abuse allegations Today 11:25 AM
- Congress passes bill to safeguard Hong Kong, protesters Today 11:15 AM
- Conquer Black Friday and Cyber Monday, whether you’re shopping online or IRL Today 10:40 AM
- #DeadUploadDay: YouTubers fight new rules for monetizing kids videos Today 10:39 AM
World’s most notorious copyright troll will have to repay its victims
Prenda Law loses another case.
The world’s most notorious “copyright troll” will finally have to pay back some of its victims.
Copyright trolls are universally reviled by anyone who uses the term, which refers to the practice of owning or legally representing a copyrighted work with the express purpose of making money by suing people over it—regardless of whether the defendant actually pirated anything. It’s particularly effective when the lawsuit alleges that someone pirated porn, because that extra hint of shame can keep victims from fighting a case in court.
None stand accused of more malfeasance than Prenda Law, a firm that tried to sue blogs that criticize it to learn the identities of their visitors, threatened to tell alleged infringers’ neighbors they stood accused of pirating porn, and allegedly uploaded that porn to the Pirate Bay itself and created sham companies to hide its tracks.
But Prenda, which has recently been nailed by a succession of judges, took another blow Wednesday. Magistrate Franklin L. Noel found that through an affiliate company named AF Holdings—a shell company, according to critics familiar with the firm—Prenda shook down four people for amounts ranging from $3,500 to $6,000. It now has to repay that money, plus legal fees.
Noting that a previous judge found AF Holdings to “have no assets other than several copyrights to pornographic movies,” Noel ordered Prenda to pay up to the four who settled their lawsuits, as well as to a fifth who successfully defended against them in court:
The Court has been the victim of a fraud perpetrated by AF Holdings, LLC. The Court concludes that the appropriate remedy for this fraud is to require AF Holdings to return all of the settlement money it received from all of the Defendants in these cases, and to pay all costs and fees (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by the Defendants. After all settlement payments are returned and other fees are paid, all five cases should be dismissed on the merits, with prejudice.
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.