- Woman with Tumblr page devoted to Dylann Roof arrested for plotting terrorism 7 Years Ago
- How much money do you need to book Beyoncé for your wedding? Monday 8:00 PM
- Twitter is stoked about Netflix’s Fyre Fest documentary Monday 7:37 PM
- Jacquees launches Twitter debate after calling himself ‘King of R&B’ Monday 6:52 PM
- Watch a British politician steal a ceremonial mace to halt Brexit proceedings Monday 6:07 PM
- Dog waits for weeks by his family’s burned house after California wildfire Monday 5:45 PM
- Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes suspended from YouTube Monday 3:46 PM
- The best sex toys for couples to heat up the holidays Monday 3:35 PM
- Chrissy Teigen shares tattoo her dad got of her face for her birthday Monday 3:31 PM
- Kavanaugh votes against hearing Planned Parenthood defunding case Monday 3:14 PM
- YouTube’s 2018 Rewind video is one of the most-hated videos of all time Monday 12:37 PM
- Roger the buff kangaroo has died at the age of 12 Monday 12:34 PM
- Elon Musk says no one is censoring his tweets Monday 12:22 PM
- Netflix drops trailer for heist movie starring Ben Affleck and Oscar Isaac Monday 12:18 PM
- Offset tweeted about missing Cardi B—and the internet isn’t having it Monday 12:17 PM
Kickstarter claims the company received requests from former project creators who unsuccessful projects were ranking embarressingly high in search results.
Kickstarter has updated its FAQ after reports that the popular crowdfunding site inserts coding into the headers of unsuccessfully funded projects to prevent them from appearing on search engine results.
The site also now acknowledged that it does not have a browse area for projects whose funding was unsuccessful. However, unsuccessfully funded projects can still be found through Kickstarter’s on-site search bar and the profile pages of the project’s creator and backers.
“In terms of external search (Google, Bing, etc), Kickstarter de-indexes projects whose funding was unsuccessful,” the company stated. “This means that unsuccessfully funded projects don’t show up in search results.
“This was implemented after receiving many requests from former project creators who were finding their unsuccessfully funded projects ranking extremely high—in some cases as the #1 result—in Google searches for their name.”
Kickstarter came under fire last week after tech journalist Dan Misener found that the company rescripts the coding on unsuccessful projects to alter their search results. Using a scraper he’d written, Misener found that 27,399 Kickstarter projects show up in the search results of engine sites like Google and Bind.
All of the projects Misener found were successful or in progress. At no point did his scraper find a single project that had failed to receive funding.
Misener argued that making unsuccessful projects searchable could have a positive effect on the outcome of future projects whose creators could learn from past mistakes.
But Kickstarter founder Yancey Strickler argued otherwise. Speaking with Gigoam after the company amended its FAQ, Strickler said that there’s not much to learn because most unsuccessful projects are constructed such that they fail to provide a solid roadmap for success.
Strickler’s alternative: Look closely at the projects that do get funded. Or consult the Kickstarter School, an onsite guide that walks users through the campaign process.
Photo via photosteve101
Chase Hoffberger reported on YouTube, web culture, and crime for the Daily Dot until 2013, when he joined the Austin Chronicle full-time. He’s now that paper’s news editor and reports on criminal justice and politics.