- New Loch Ness monster video may just confirm giant eel theory Wednesday 8:04 PM
- Instagram to restrict posts promoting diet culture and plastic surgery Wednesday 6:58 PM
- Apple wants to trademark ‘Slofie,’ its term for slow-motion selfies Wednesday 5:51 PM
- Fortnite leak reveals a Batman crossover event may be happening Wednesday 5:32 PM
- The explosion at a bull semen factory generated a lot of obvious jokes Wednesday 4:33 PM
- Jessica Jaymes, adult film star, dead at 43 Wednesday 4:18 PM
- How to stream Falcons vs. Colts in Week 3 Wednesday 4:05 PM
- Beto O’Rourke says he opposes police use of facial recognition tech Wednesday 4:01 PM
- Lawsuit alleges woman was kidnapped by Lyft driver and gang-raped Wednesday 3:19 PM
- Facebook and Ray-Ban want to replace smartphones with smart glasses Wednesday 3:13 PM
- Sirfetch’d is the gallant new Pokémon winning everyone’s heart Wednesday 3:09 PM
- Danielle Cohn’s dad says she’s not really 15 years old Wednesday 2:14 PM
- Chilling ad by Sandy Hook Promise features kids using school supplies during a shooting Wednesday 1:50 PM
- Don’t fall victim to this Venmo texting scam Wednesday 1:18 PM
- Here’s what’s coming and going on Netflix in October 2019 Wednesday 12:55 PM
Google’s about to start selling your image to advertisers
The Internet’s newest commercial spokesperson is… you.
In a terms of service update released today, Google sought to clarify how a user’s “name and photo might appear in Google products (including in reviews, advertising and other commercial contexts).” Read on and you’ll get the gist: Google has claimed the right—as of Nov. 11—to use your personal data to marketers whose brands you +1, follow, or otherwise comment about.
Of course, Google would rather you think of this as a desirable or fun new feature rather than a way for advertisers to generate word-of-mouth buzz for their products and services on a much grander, even global scale:
Feedback from people you know can save you time and improve results for you and your friends across all Google services, including Search, Maps, Play and in advertising. For example, your friends might see that you rated an album 4 stars on the band’s Google Play page. And the +1 you gave your favorite local bakery could be included in an ad that the bakery runs through Google.
The company also stressed that users under 18 years of age would not be subject to the policy and that you are still “in control” of what you share—just not necessarily how and when it’s shared, apparently. They’re calling these personalized recommendations “shared endorsements,” and the theory is this: When you run a Google search for, say, a local hairstylist, your friend’s opinion on a nearby salon will pop up.
Here’s the page where you turn shared endorsements off, not that you’re so active on Google+, mind you. Facebook, though, already pursued a near-identical form of revenue—shortly after losing a $20 million lawsuit over its use of private data, no less—only to provoke a Federal Trade Commission inquiry that stalled the plan.
For all the reassurances from Google, which has paid plenty of fines for misrepresenting its privacy policies and similar violations in the past, skepticism and paranoia are the order of the day. The New York Times quoted Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, who was less than enthusiastic: “Users reasonably expect that their comments should be used as they intended. People don’t typically race around handing their friends leaflets and advertisements.”
In fact, the tightrope-walking language of Google’s announcement alone might set off alarm bells: If this were a change that really benefited users in some respect, would the tech giant be so worried about their reaction?
Photo by Yang and Yun’s Album/Flickr
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'