NSA admits its initial privacy promise was wrong
General Keith Alexander, who heads the NSA, wrote Tuesday, in a letter obtained by Politico: "After reviewing your letter, I agree that the fact sheet that the National Security Agency posted on its website on 18 June 2013 could have more precisely described the requirements for collection under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act.”
The letter was addressed to senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.), who had criticized the NSA's "fact sheet" posted on its website. They specifically cited one point that they called "inaccurate," and encouraged the NSA to correct it "as soon as possible," as "it portrays protections for Americans' privacy as being significantly stronger than they actually are."
The senators, both members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, couldn't state in the open letter which of the NSA's claims it contested, as it referred to classified information not even everyone in Congress is privy to. They specified the point in a separate, closed document.
Alexander offered, in place of the rescinded memo, a version so thoroughly revised that it's not immediately clear which of the original version's 15 bullet points was inaccurate. Instead, the new letter makes broader, simpler claims about FISA's section 702—which is tied with the mysterious PRISM program. Those include that acquisitions under that law:
may not intentionally target any person known at the time of acquisition to be located in the United States [and] shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Alexander also conceded the senators' other objection. They had taken issue with the NSA's claim that "any inadvertently acquired communication of or concerning a U.S. person must be promptly destroyed if it is neither relevant to the authorized purpose nor evidence of a crime" (emphasis ours).
The NSA has previously claimed, in response to Wyden's questioning, that it can't even estimate how many Americans have had their data collected. So presumably, that means the NSA can't verify they actually delete all unrelated U.S. data.
Photo by 1/25 Stryker Brigade Combat Team/Flickr
Texans are adopting dogs in droves to rescue them from flooded animal shelters
Now this is Southern hospitality.88k
This photo of an Army widow at her husband's grave reminds us what Memorial Day is all about
Laureen Lopez-Berry's husband Richard was killed by a car bomb in Afghanistan in 2012.39k
How to play every classic video game on your phone
The best '80s and '90s consoles in the palm of your hand.21k
Is this celebrity fitness trend harmful to your health?
Kim Kardashian and Amber Rose have embraced the 'waist-training' trend on Instagram. But that doesn't mean it doesn't have serious consequences.
Your definitive guide to the best robot butts
Thick, toned and metal.7