Pinterest updates Terms of Service
Since the purpose of Pinterest is for users to populate the site with images they do not own, the network has been in a legal gray area ever since users discovered that pinning content from around the Web might be on the wrong side of the law. Pinterest users, concerned that the sites’ vague policies could get them sued or worse, have even been deleting their boards to avoid uncertain punishment from copyright holders and Pinterest itself.
What’s more, few users who expressed their concerns with copyright were about to get a response from Pinterest. Until recently, the network has been skirting the issue, addressing just two bloggers’ concerns with legality.
Now, there should be no ambiguity about any of Pinterest’s policies. The network writes that the new terms, which take effect on April 6, two weeks from the date they were announced, “are easier to understand and better reflect the direction our company is headed in the future.”
In a blog post signed by “Ben [Silbermann] & the Pinterest team,” the social network highlighted a few of the most significant changes:
First, Pinterest has revised its terms to reflect that the site will never attempt to profit off users’ pins. Originally, the Terms stated that Pinterest could sell any content uploaded to the site.
“Selling content was never our intention and we removed this from our updated Terms,” it wrote.
The site also announced new features. Soon, Pinterest wrote, there will be new tools to help copyright holders more easier report infringement. It also wrote in language that will “pave the way” for long-awaited new additions: a Pinterest API to aid developers in creating third-party Pinterest tools, and private pinboards.
Finally, Pinterest encouraged all users to review the terms and write in suggestions to support@Pinterest.com. (The Daily Dot is still awaiting a response to the support question we wrote to Pinterest two weeks ago.)
The announcement, which was posted on Tumblr, has netted hundreds of user comments since it was published this afternoon.
Surprisingly, over a hundred of the comments deal with a suggestion for Pinterest that was not addressed in the update: the prevalence of pornography on the site.
“[N]ow get rid of the porn on here...” wrote Kimberly Lewis.
Armory builds Iron Man a suit worthy of the Norse gods
Tony Stark would be the most stylish hero in Asgard with this leather armor.18k
Dudes build huge real-life gundam so the U.S. can fight Japan in a giant robot battle
Japan, you have one year to name the battlefield.16k
Radio station proves Kanye West doesn't hold a candle to Freddie Mercury
Nothing really matters—especially this cover.12k
Cardinals fire employee associated with Astros 'hack'
One of the first dominoes has fallen in the Cardinals-Astros scandal.
The 3 biggest questions heading into the ESL ESEA final
The first edition of the ESL ESEA Pro League is coming to a head this weekend with $250,000 on the line.23