The 2016 guide to political fact-checking on the internet

art deco congress

Illustration by Max Fleishman

The truth may be hard to swallow. But it's important to find.

It's never been easier to find out if a politician is telling a lie. And it's never been harder to get the truth out.

Many of the rumors that have dominated the Election 2016 news cycle originated from fake news sites or chain emails. An email from the WikiLeaks DNC email dump supposedly showing DNC staffers referring to Ohio and Pennsylvania voters as "white trash" turned out to be fabricated. Rumors that President Obama signed an executive order banning the Pledge of Allegiance and that the Obamas are buying a vacation home in Dubai were both traced to fake news stories. A story claiming that Megyn Kelly and Bill O'Reilly are Clinton operatives was based on the fact that a DNC staffer listed a meeting with their booking agents.

The rapid dissemination of falsehoods and uncovering of truths is a reoccurring theme of the 2016 presidential election.

That’s why political fact-checkers see their role as so important. They investigate submitted claims from politicians and other sources of authority for accuracy and then write stories about their findings.

The "big three" non-partisan political fact-checkers—Politifact,, and the Washington Post's Fact Checker—came of age in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, and they’re all working overtime for the 2016 election.

"For political fact-checking, 2016 is like 2012 but on speed,” wrote Alexio Mantzarlis, who leads the Internet Fact-Checking Network at Poynter, in an email to the Daily Dot. “The major fact-checkers are breaking traffic records, TV hosts have been skewered for not fact-checking candidates, and more outlets than likely ever before have run fact-checking sections. At the same time, people—mostly liberal media watchers—have been freaking out about whether we live in a ‘post-fact’ era.”

Some credit Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for ushering us into this "post-fact" era. CNN reported that Trump often gets his information from sketchy news sites and inaccurate internet rumors. Politifact noted, for example, that Trump's claim that Barack Obama wants to resettle 250,000 Syrian refugees actually originated from a story headlined "U.S. to House 250,000 Syrian Refugees at Navajo, Standing Rock Indian Reservations," which came from a fake news site, As of this writing, Politifact has rated a grand total of 179 of Donald Trump's fact checks as either "mostly false," "false,” or "pants on fire."

“Be skeptical. Check the author. Check the publisher. Check the sources.”

Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post's FactChecker, however, is reluctant to believe the public perception of facts has been changed by the rise of Trump and the pace of misinformation on the internet. "People have always been more willing to accept facts that mesh with their own preconceived notions—and are skeptical of facts which do not fit those notions,” Kessler said. “What is different is that people can now only watch or read news sources which conform to those notions. So the country is splitting into two countries, each with its own set of facts."

If you’re looking to verify the veracity of a claim, there are basic steps you can take.

“Be skeptical. Check the author. Check the publisher. Check the sources,” noted Eugene Kiely of “You have no idea how many people forward us emails that are anonymously written that made unsubstantiated claims with no sources. Same thing with some ‘stories’ and ‘reports’ written and posted on partisan and advocacy websites. Who is behind the website? What’s their agenda? How it is funded? How transparent is it? Does its articles and reports provide named sources of information with links to source material so readers can check the facts themselves? Reagan used to say, ‘Trust, but verify.’  I’d say verify first, and then determine if the source is worthy of your trust.”

For those looking to go one step further, here’s an overview of the major political fact-checking websites.


1) Politifact

Politifact is a project of the Tampa Bay Times. It won a Pulitzer Prize  for its coverage of the 2008 election, during which it examined 750 claims.

Politifact fact-checks claims by politicians at the federal, state, and local level, as well as political parties, PACs, and advocacy groups. Politifact rates the accuracy of these claims on its Truth-O-Meter, which goes from "True," "Mostly True," "Half True," "False," and "Pants on Fire." There are separate verticals of Politifact for global news and select states.

2) is the oldest of the big three fact-checking sites; it launched in 2003. The site is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. The site fact-checks claims made by president, members of Congress, presidential candidates, and other members of the political arena. It mainly reviews TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews, and news releases. The site's stated goal is to "apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding."

Eugene Kiely of says the organization has "never seen anything" like Trump in its 13 years of operation. reviews the year's most egregious false claims in an annual "Whoppers of the Year" story. From Kiely:

In 2015, we recognized that Trump had an unusually large number of false claims and that in some instances he would double down on his false claims and insist they were true—even when us and others have proven him wrong. As a result, we named him the ‘King of the Whoppers.’ It was the first time we have ever done it, and we hope the last.

Viral Spiral is a section of devoted to internet rumors. “We get a lot of questions from readers asking us to fact check claims that they read on the internet. Hundreds a day,” Kiely noted. “It’s discouraging that the internet is used by some to spread misinformation, but on the other hand, the internet provides the resources people need to debunk bogus claims. So it is a double-edged sword. People need to be skeptical of what they read on the internet and use it to check on claims that they suspect may be wrong."

3) Washington Post's Fact Checker

The Post's Fact Checker blog is run by journalist Glenn Kessler. The site assesses claims made by politicians or political advocacy groups and gives out Pinochios based on its level of accuracy.

According to Kessler, one of the most widely read Fact Checker columns was a debunking of the Sean Hannity-backed claim that Trump lent his private plane to transport 200 Gulf War Marines back home.

A separate vertical of, focuses on false claims in campaign ads and other advertising. The site debunks scientific and health claims.  

4) Open Secrets

Open Secrets tracks money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy. It allows you to easily track campaign spending and contributions without laboring through the Federal Election Commission's website. Open Secrets also tracks the money that the private sector, industry groups, unions, and other lobbyists spend to lobby Congress.

5) The Sunlight Foundation

The Sunlight Foundation is a nonprofit that lead the way for public accountability data journalism. Its Hall of Justice offers state-by-state data sets on criminal justice. 

6) is the go-to destination for debunking strange internet rumors. California couple Barbara and David Mikkelson founded the site in 1995 to uncover urban legends, rumors, and other questionable bits of folklore that had begun cropping up in chain emails and message boards.

Snopes has spent a large chunk of its time shedding light on Election 2016 rumors that originated from memes and fake news stories. A recent fact check revealed that a meme stating that all living ex-presidents are against Trump is not entirely true (though reports have emerged that George W.H. Bush will be voting for Clinton). also laid to rest a rumor that Clinton sent a body double in her place to a 9/11 memorial service, which reached momentum after #HillarysBodyDouble began to trend on Twitter. 


Note: Partisan fact-checkers are those with a purported liberal or conservative bent.

Media Matters

Media Matters is a media watchdog group that focuses on conservative news. Since its launch in 2004 in the height of the Bush administration, Media Matters has analyzed conservative media, including broadcast, radio, and print media for factual errors. Media Matters narrowed its focus on Fox News and a handful of other conservative news sites in 2011, in what Media Matters founder David Brock deemed as "a war on Fox."

Correct the Record

A pro-Hillary Clinton SuperPAC that fact-checks claims made against Clinton by Trump and other politicians, Correct the Record also runs Trump Lies and the Benghazi Research Center.


NewsBusters is a website that devotes itself to "combatting liberal media bias." NewsBusters was launched by the Media Research Center in 2005, the same group behind It has been criticized by Media Matters and others for its questionable fact-checking techniques.

Layer 8
Inside the twisted campaign that's putting Trump ads on Pornhub
Warning: This story contains graphic images of pornography.   Tom Chandler had a dream. It was a simple dream, but it was a beautiful dream, nonetheless.
From Our VICE Partners

Pure, uncut internet. Straight to your inbox.

Thanks for subscribing to our newsletter!