Writer Jack Stuef is tracking down the source material for the beloved Twitter spam bot, one tweet at a time. 

Throughout its strange existence, beloved Twitter spambot @horse_ebooks has amassed thousands of faithful followers, endured accusations of its authenticity, and spawned everything from themed collections to comic renderings of its tweets. Despite the controversy, @horse_ebooks continues to tweet obscure passages from across the Web—prompting RTs, @replies, and attempts at further analysis.

Now, one man has decided to delve deeper into @horse_ebooks than anyone ever before. Today, writer Jack Stuef launched The Annotated @Horse_ebooks, a Tumblr dedicated to dissecting the account tweet-by-tweet.

“The purpose of this blog is to provide sourcing for texts quoted by @Horse_ebooks and, whenever possible, provide context,” Steuf wrote in blog’s first entry. “So, yes, I’m sort of ruining it.”

“Ruining it” is something @horse_ebooks fans have been accusing writers and journalists of for some time now. When Gawker writer Adrian Chen offered $50 for someone to go to @horse_ebooks creator Alexei Kouznetsov’s address, readers fought back, accusing Chen of “ruining” the spambot.

While Stuef might, in his own words, be “ruining it,” his The Annotated @Horse_ebooks is already taking Horse’s tweets to previously unknown places. An entry dissecting a tweet reading “Dalton pacing up and down; another man enters; men shake” sources the line to a “screenplay (or “photoplay”) from a 1914 “treatise” on screenwriting called “The Photoplay,” written by one Henry Albert Phillips. Dalton is a character that comes up over and over again in Horse’s tweets—a mysterious occurrence that the spambot’s seemingly “random” tweets can’t explain.

Will contextual readings engage or disgust fans of @Horse_ebooks? At this point, can any man (or woman) truly spoil the magic of the spambot?

Perhaps only Dalton knows.

Photo via The Annotated @Horse_ebooks

Promoted Stories Powered by Sharethrough
horse ebooks
A writer defies our Twitter spambot overlords
Adrian Chen’s got his lasso out and damned if he isn’t going to catch the most illustrious stallion on the Internet’s wild frontier—@horse_ebooks.
This couple's counter-protesting with pro-lifers, and documenting it on Tumblr
In late June, the Supreme Court rejected a law, enacted in 2007, that required 35-foot buffer zones around abortion clinics in Massachusetts. This law was intended to help minimize episodes of violence and harassment against women and families entering clinics, but the Supreme Court decided it violated the First Amendment.

Pure, uncut internet. Straight to your inbox.

Thanks for subscribing to our newsletter!